MediaWiki talk:Common.css: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:
:::::::: Like I mentioned before I'm not too fond of hacking up collapsible items via JS when a proper extension exists for that (even though we can't install it at the moment) and I also didn't find any solution I'd consider acceptable for the vertical scrolling issue you pointed when the sidebar position is fixed. I might (or might not) revisit this "problem" in the future but for now I just entirely dropped the CSS responsible for conditionally locking the sidebar position on screen and the padding between the sidebar content and the logo (our logo already has a lot of vertical padding on itself, no need to add more) - [[User:mbc07|mbc07]] ([[User talk:mbc07|talk]]) 05:10, 8 February 2022 (CET)
:::::::: Like I mentioned before I'm not too fond of hacking up collapsible items via JS when a proper extension exists for that (even though we can't install it at the moment) and I also didn't find any solution I'd consider acceptable for the vertical scrolling issue you pointed when the sidebar position is fixed. I might (or might not) revisit this "problem" in the future but for now I just entirely dropped the CSS responsible for conditionally locking the sidebar position on screen and the padding between the sidebar content and the logo (our logo already has a lot of vertical padding on itself, no need to add more) - [[User:mbc07|mbc07]] ([[User talk:mbc07|talk]]) 05:10, 8 February 2022 (CET)


::::::::: Understandable. The position fixed may be convenient for long pages but was not the greatest idea considering too many of the side effects. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 05:30, 8 February 2022 (CET)
== So the menu flying problem ==
== So the menu flying problem ==


6,576

edits

Navigation menu