Template talk:Config required: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Will probably take off the bad settings from sandboxed pages and docs when the sandboxed template test is finished. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 05:59, 8 February 2022 (CET) | : Will probably take off the bad settings from sandboxed pages and docs when the sandboxed template test is finished. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 05:59, 8 February 2022 (CET) | ||
== Table Tags == | |||
Since the output of this template seems to expect it to be embedded in a table, would be good if less table formatting tags were needed when using it. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 04:40, 9 February 2022 (CET) | |||
: We can try to hand off as many of the table tags as possible into the template. I think I want the parser functions (e.g. <nowiki>{{#if:}}</nowiki>) to stay out of it to prevent useless template calling. Clearly there's appeal to less editing required. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:38, 11 February 2022 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 01:39, 11 February 2022
Misformatted settings
Haven't looked at how this works in general, but may be good if we could exclude sandbox pages and the few other arbitrary pages Category:Config template misformatted settings currently captures. Kolano (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2022 (CET)
- Will probably take off the bad settings from sandboxed pages and docs when the sandboxed template test is finished. Lucario (talk) 05:59, 8 February 2022 (CET)
Table Tags
Since the output of this template seems to expect it to be embedded in a table, would be good if less table formatting tags were needed when using it. Kolano (talk) 04:40, 9 February 2022 (CET)