Template talk:Problems/Wii MotionPlus Required: Difference between revisions

From Dolphin Emulator Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Should be possible. We've tried to avoid them for most Problem templates, but perhaps we want to just use a variable the distinguish the subtlety different needed text in one template. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 01:12, 13 January 2017 (CET)
Should be possible. We've tried to avoid them for most Problem templates, but perhaps we want to just use a variable the distinguish the subtlety different needed text in one template. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 01:12, 13 January 2017 (CET)
Um... A problem template is not the right way to go about it... This problem exists because there is a hard barrier for entry that Dolphin cannot emulate - motion plus. It is vital to inform users of that with a problem tempalte! But if it is possible but not required, how is that a problem?. Users can still emulate it fine. Imo, this should be a note in the description, or a "motion plus optional" category. That would be less overt and still accessible. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 12:09, 13 January 2017 (CET)

Revision as of 12:09, 13 January 2017

Could there be a variant of this for games that can use Motion+ but don't require it? Thinking of games like GoVacation. JMC4789 (talk) 13:43, 12 January 2017 (CET)

Should be possible. We've tried to avoid them for most Problem templates, but perhaps we want to just use a variable the distinguish the subtlety different needed text in one template. Kolano (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2017 (CET)

Um... A problem template is not the right way to go about it... This problem exists because there is a hard barrier for entry that Dolphin cannot emulate - motion plus. It is vital to inform users of that with a problem tempalte! But if it is possible but not required, how is that a problem?. Users can still emulate it fine. Imo, this should be a note in the description, or a "motion plus optional" category. That would be less overt and still accessible. - MaJoR (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2017 (CET)