User talk:FreeEmulator: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→New super mario bros. Wii: Reply) |
m (Text replacement - "== ([^=\[{])" to "== $1") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== New super mario bros. Wii == | == New super mario bros. Wii == | ||
Hi, about your testing entry; I think it is not a proper testing entry, prompting readers to watch your youtube videos to get an idea of how it worked. Not picking a fight, but I believe you should change it. At least write if the game worked or not. Cheers, [[User:10n45|10n45]] ([[User talk:10n45|talk]]) 10:26, 28 August 2014 (CEST) | Hi, about your testing entry; I think it is not a proper testing entry, prompting readers to watch your youtube videos to get an idea of how it worked. Not picking a fight, but I believe you should change it. At least write if the game worked or not. Cheers, [[User:10n45|10n45]] ([[User talk:10n45|talk]]) 10:26, 28 August 2014 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:32, 1 June 2015
New super mario bros. Wii
Hi, about your testing entry; I think it is not a proper testing entry, prompting readers to watch your youtube videos to get an idea of how it worked. Not picking a fight, but I believe you should change it. At least write if the game worked or not. Cheers, 10n45 (talk) 10:26, 28 August 2014 (CEST)
- This is fine. I like when test entries are provided for vids, since it captures details like the Dolphin version and PC specs that frequently are ommited from just video posts. The main concern is when videos get deleted, it frequently leaves just a broken link behind without details of the testing that occurred. In this case the testing state is indicated "Played the entire game and made videos of all levels, star coins, and secret goals." (i.e. game and all objectives can be completed). Kolano (talk) 18:05, 28 August 2014 (CEST)