Difference between revisions of "User talk:Miksel12"

From Dolphin Emulator Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
: The particular issue does belong under Enhancements. However, a reason to move it would be to align with the way problems are tracked by the Problems template, which should aid with clean-up post the 6.0 release. Really we should add a secondary Enhancements template to handle them similarly (even though there is no commitment to resolve enhancement issues). I've been too lazy to go through the gyrations to set one up though. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 04:45, 23 June 2019 (CEST)
 
: The particular issue does belong under Enhancements. However, a reason to move it would be to align with the way problems are tracked by the Problems template, which should aid with clean-up post the 6.0 release. Really we should add a secondary Enhancements template to handle them similarly (even though there is no commitment to resolve enhancement issues). I've been too lazy to go through the gyrations to set one up though. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 04:45, 23 June 2019 (CEST)
  
:: What do you mean a secondary Enhancements template? Is it that Problems template but for enhancements? I want to know what happened when Miksel took the entry back into Enhancements. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 13:03, 23 June 2019 (CEST)
+
:: What do you mean a secondary Enhancements template? Is it that Problems template but for enhancement entries? I want to know what happened when Miksel took the entry back into Enhancements. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 13:03, 23 June 2019 (CEST)

Revision as of 13:05, 23 June 2019

Fixed entry moved back into Enhancements?

I see that you have taken Sonic Heroes#Graphical Glitches with IR>1 back into Enhancements section and I suppose you have read guidelines, I want you to know it's one man change. I have discussion about it here Project talk:Wiki Conventions#Inapporopriate use of Enhancements Section. Enhancement issues are normally wontfix and yet this one is fixed, shouldn't it go to Problems section now? Lucario (talk) 02:38, 23 June 2019 (CEST)

The particular issue does belong under Enhancements. However, a reason to move it would be to align with the way problems are tracked by the Problems template, which should aid with clean-up post the 6.0 release. Really we should add a secondary Enhancements template to handle them similarly (even though there is no commitment to resolve enhancement issues). I've been too lazy to go through the gyrations to set one up though. Kolano (talk) 04:45, 23 June 2019 (CEST)
What do you mean a secondary Enhancements template? Is it that Problems template but for enhancement entries? I want to know what happened when Miksel took the entry back into Enhancements. Lucario (talk) 13:03, 23 June 2019 (CEST)