6,576
edits
 |
Progress Continues
We've already had 21687 updates since Dolphin 5.0. Keep up with Dolphin's continuing progress through the Dolphin Blog: February, March, and April 2024 Dolphin Progress Report. |
 |
The Dolphin Emulator Wiki needs your help! Dolphin can play thousands of games, and changes are happening all the time. Help us keep up! Join in and help us make this the best resource for Dolphin. |
Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide: Difference between revisions
Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide (view source)
Revision as of 12:29, 28 November 2015
, 28 November 2015no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::0 stars does mean "untested" there, but it seemed odd to grant a title a star if it didn't support 3d at all. Though perhaps the more appropriate rating for them would be "Excellent" as they presumably work just fine /w 3d options set, they just fail to make use of 3d (which I'm guessing would be obvious for most of these titles). If we have a multi-star system we still need clearer rules on what distinguishes: "Fair", "Good", and "Excellent" (or perhaps just "Fair"/"Good since presumably "Excellent" means things just work as expected). I'm still leaning towards not having such a fine grained rating system, and leaving the discussion of specific issues under Enhancements to indicate the level or problems and proposed corrections.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 10:19, 28 November 2015 (CET) | ::::0 stars does mean "untested" there, but it seemed odd to grant a title a star if it didn't support 3d at all. Though perhaps the more appropriate rating for them would be "Excellent" as they presumably work just fine /w 3d options set, they just fail to make use of 3d (which I'm guessing would be obvious for most of these titles). If we have a multi-star system we still need clearer rules on what distinguishes: "Fair", "Good", and "Excellent" (or perhaps just "Fair"/"Good since presumably "Excellent" means things just work as expected). I'm still leaning towards not having such a fine grained rating system, and leaving the discussion of specific issues under Enhancements to indicate the level or problems and proposed corrections.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 10:19, 28 November 2015 (CET) | ||
:::::I'd like JMC47 to come here and explain what do they mean in the rating column since it was him who made up these I think. We'd still need to make up distinguish between "untested" and "not recommended". 3 gray stars with text hovering on them perhaps? What text would that be, and what about parameter? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 11:28, 28 November 2015 (CET) | |||