6,576
edits
Project:General Discussions: Difference between revisions
→Problems section automation
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
::::::::: So, like I said, I still prefer to rewrite that "awkward sentence" a thousand of times until it gets acceptable on those VC pages with no "local" problems but with Global Problems than doing all that hard work just for the sake of merging both sections in a single one, especially considering that only a small subset of pages (VC titles) would be affected while it would also make the Problems section of those VC pages inconsistent with how this same section works everywhere else. The work required is simply not worth as there aren't any real benefits of doing that. By the way, if there aren't any other points besides this one, I'll probably start implementing {{tl|Problems}} on the pages sometime during this week. - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 06:52, 27 November 2016 (CET) | ::::::::: So, like I said, I still prefer to rewrite that "awkward sentence" a thousand of times until it gets acceptable on those VC pages with no "local" problems but with Global Problems than doing all that hard work just for the sake of merging both sections in a single one, especially considering that only a small subset of pages (VC titles) would be affected while it would also make the Problems section of those VC pages inconsistent with how this same section works everywhere else. The work required is simply not worth as there aren't any real benefits of doing that. By the way, if there aren't any other points besides this one, I'll probably start implementing {{tl|Problems}} on the pages sometime during this week. - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 06:52, 27 November 2016 (CET) | ||
:::::::::: You've got really good point about sorting active and fixed problems and the global problem entries will always be in top before the local problem entries. Might be overcome with calling global problems template twice and regex to filter out active then fixed in separate template call into top and bottom beyond list of local issues. This will probably require a full duplication of itself with slightly different regex with regex mainly for renaming global problem headings with "(global problem)" added in. I see that you're making a big deal out of the edit button used to distinguish things and how the global problem entries being merged into the Problems template are going to confuse the editors. The global problems, after merged into the same section as other local problems, can still be identified by looking for "(global problem)" in the heading of the issue, and the comment tags will point editors to the location where global problem entries can be edited at, if they plan to edit them. How is this any more confused? | |||
:::::::::: I don't know well with regex, so I may be wrong with how feasible it's gonna be to handle global problem entries into top and bottom and edit each heading with "(global problem)" added in. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 05:52, 28 November 2016 (CET) | |||
=== Category Intersection Search === | === Category Intersection Search === | ||