15,198
edits
 |
Progress Continues
We've already had 21685 updates since Dolphin 5.0. Keep up with Dolphin's continuing progress through the Dolphin Blog: February, March, and April 2024 Dolphin Progress Report. |
 |
The Dolphin Emulator Wiki needs your help! Dolphin can play thousands of games, and changes are happening all the time. Help us keep up! Join in and help us make this the best resource for Dolphin. |
Project:General Discussions: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::::::::I really think that information such as widescreen GCN games and dual-layer games should be up top somewhere with some degree of emphasis instead of somewhere in the main article. If you are worried about my removal of subsections causing the new sections to look more barren, there is missing information about MD5 codes for good dumps of GCN/Wii games just to throw an idea out there. Just have to devise a chart/template or something to log such information. [[Ripping Game Discs]] has CleanRip. CleanRip uses XML files that has that data for most games. Somehow have to extract the values quickly with a bot. | ::::::::I really think that information such as widescreen GCN games and dual-layer games should be up top somewhere with some degree of emphasis instead of somewhere in the main article. If you are worried about my removal of subsections causing the new sections to look more barren, there is missing information about MD5 codes for good dumps of GCN/Wii games just to throw an idea out there. Just have to devise a chart/template or something to log such information. [[Ripping Game Discs]] has CleanRip. CleanRip uses XML files that has that data for most games. Somehow have to extract the values quickly with a bot. | ||
::::::::The idea of rating each problem is to give the user a quick way to evaluate the cost of emulating things accurately instead of having to look at a wall of text which can be more redundant than the ratings in some cases. Higher accuracy takes up more CPU/GPU cycles generally speaking. I'm not expecting this system to be deployed any time soon unlike the banners we devised so far. Needs several revisions and tweaks. --[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|talk]]) 02:35, 7 November 2015 (CET) | ::::::::The idea of rating each problem is to give the user a quick way to evaluate the cost of emulating things accurately instead of having to look at a wall of text which can be more redundant than the ratings in some cases. Higher accuracy takes up more CPU/GPU cycles generally speaking. I'm not expecting this system to be deployed any time soon unlike the banners we devised so far. Needs several revisions and tweaks. --[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|talk]]) 02:35, 7 November 2015 (CET) | ||
::::::::: Lucario, about the section name, I don't like Emulation Info neither Common Mistakes, but from the point you raised, Emulation Information seems a little better, we may stick with that. About raising it above Problems Section, I think we should (+1 from me), but it's a somewhat big structure change that affects a huge number of pages, I would like to hear from MaJoR and Kolano too before proceeding on that. And about rating the problems, well, that's another user against it, don't waste your time Wildgoosespeeder. - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) | |||
=== Global Replacement Request === | === Global Replacement Request === | ||