Project talk:Wiki Conventions: Difference between revisions

Line 90: Line 90:
Ping? [[Marvel Super Hero Squad#Corrupted Videos]] felt so wrong still. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 02:41, 23 November 2016 (CET)
Ping? [[Marvel Super Hero Squad#Corrupted Videos]] felt so wrong still. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 02:41, 23 November 2016 (CET)


: They are problems with enhancements, so I have no issue with them appearing under enhancements. I believe the base problem was that we don't want these sorts of issues effecting ratings, and thus banished them from the Problems section. I wouldn't be opposed to adding a separate section to handle them, but such has some problems we'd need to address. A similar issue occurs with "Emulation Information" so it may not be bad to address generally anyway.
: They are problems with enhancements, so I have no issue with them appearing under enhancements. I believe the base problem was that we don't want these sorts of issues affecting ratings, and thus banished them from the Problems section. I wouldn't be opposed to adding a separate section to handle them, but such has some problems we'd need to address. A similar issue occurs with "Emulation Information" so it may not be bad to address generally anyway.
: I think the general opposition to adding additional sections is that general editors frequently fail to have necessary insight to use the appropriate sections, particularly if they don't pre-exist in the page. Having them pre-exist causes an alternate layout problem, in that many empty sections are off-putting. Due to that we had tried to limit the use of these sorts of categorizations, but it seems we've slid a good distance from everything under problems and only problems handling of the past.
: I think the general opposition to adding additional sections is that general editors frequently fail to have necessary insight to use the appropriate sections, particularly if they don't pre-exist in the page. Having them pre-exist causes an alternate layout problem, in that many empty sections are off-putting. Due to that we had tried to limit the use of these sorts of categorizations, but it seems we've slid a good distance from everything under problems and only problems handling of the past.
: In any case, support might be higher if we can work out ways to try to ensure new edits go to appropriate sections, and there would be a means to avoid the ugliness of empty sections. Perhaps further commented sections inclusive of some descriptive commentary? Still unclear this will see general support.
: In any case, support might be higher if we can work out ways to try to ensure new edits go to appropriate sections, and there would be a means to avoid the ugliness of empty sections. Perhaps further commented sections inclusive of some descriptive commentary? Still unclear this will see general support.
: [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 03:06, 23 November 2016 (CET)
: [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 03:06, 23 November 2016 (CET)
:: I think better commenting the sections is a good idea. I second that. [[User:Karasuhebi|Karasuhebi]] ([[User talk:Karasuhebi|talk]]) 05:18, 23 November 2016 (CET)


== Change Name: Emulation Information -> Emulation Notes? ==
== Change Name: Emulation Information -> Emulation Notes? ==
90

edits