Talk:Bluetooth Passthrough: Difference between revisions

(→‎Compatibility list: new section)
Line 8: Line 8:


After thinking about this a bit more, maybe a 3 star rating system would be enough. 0 for untested adapters, 1 for broken (either not detected, or with major issues), 2 for working with small issues (difficulty connecting 4 Wiimotes) and 3 for perfect adapters. (By the way, now that Dolphin can shut down games gracefully, Wiimote connections should be terminated properly before a HCI reset, so hopefully it should work better.) --[[User:Léo|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo|talk]]) 19:12, 7 October 2016 (CEST)
After thinking about this a bit more, maybe a 3 star rating system would be enough. 0 for untested adapters, 1 for broken (either not detected, or with major issues), 2 for working with small issues (difficulty connecting 4 Wiimotes) and 3 for perfect adapters. (By the way, now that Dolphin can shut down games gracefully, Wiimote connections should be terminated properly before a HCI reset, so hopefully it should work better.) --[[User:Léo|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo|talk]]) 19:12, 7 October 2016 (CEST)
== Compatibility list ==
What exactly is revision column? Dolphin revision (e.g. 5.0-1024) or hardware revision? I'm assuming it's hardware revision and, is it really needed? It doesn't seem to change behavior, and some vendors actually wrong uses the revision field to differentiate different manufacturers (for example, the Atheros AR5B22 has models from Samsung, Dell, Killer Networks and all of them share exactly the same hardware design and FCC certification, even the drivers can be swapped between them, the only difference being the hardware revision field)... - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 20:41, 11 October 2016 (CEST)