Talk:Bluetooth Passthrough: Difference between revisions

Talk:Bluetooth Passthrough (view source)

Revision as of 00:05, 26 October 2016

89 bytes added , 26 October 2016

m

→‎Simplifying the result table: whoops, forgot to sign

Léo

279

edits

Revision as of 00:05, 26 October 2016 (view source) Léo (talk \| contribs) (→‎Simplifying the result table: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 00:05, 26 October 2016 (view source) Léo (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Simplifying the result table: whoops, forgot to sign) Newer edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	I've noticed that the audio quality and range can be hard to judge, and that there have been loads of different values in these two columns. What do you think of simplifying this, by having "Good" for the Wii Bluetooth module (which is the reference) ''and'' anything that's good enough to be indistinguishable from console? And same for range.		I've noticed that the audio quality and range can be hard to judge, and that there have been loads of different values in these two columns. What do you think of simplifying this, by having "Good" for the Wii Bluetooth module (which is the reference) ''and'' anything that's good enough to be indistinguishable from console? And same for range.

	Also, while the table is very detailed, I fear that it may become harder to read and compare adapters as more results get added. Could we add some sort of rating system as the last column, as some sort of summary? As discussed previously, it'd be star based. 0 for untested adapters; 1 for non-working adapters or broken pairing; 2 for anything that's near perfect but has some flaws; and 3 for everything that's ''as good as'' or ''better than'' the reference adapter.		Also, while the table is very detailed, I fear that it may become harder to read and compare adapters as more results get added. Could we add some sort of rating system as the last column, as some sort of summary? As discussed previously, it'd be star based. 0 for untested adapters; 1 for non-working adapters or broken pairing; 2 for anything that's near perfect but has some flaws; and 3 for everything that's ''as good as'' or ''better than'' the reference adapter. --[[User:Léo\|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo\|talk]]) 00:05, 26 October 2016 (CEST)