Talk:Bluetooth Passthrough: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
: I didn't suggest removing audio quality from the table, but putting "good" for anything that sounds the same as with the Wii BT module. Since there's still a difference, maybe we should change that back to "Perfect" or "Very good" for the Wii adapter? And yes, it's not easy to improve the chart's readability while keeping enough detail... [[User:Léo|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo|talk]]) 15:37, 28 October 2016 (CEST)
: I didn't suggest removing audio quality from the table, but putting "good" for anything that sounds the same as with the Wii BT module. Since there's still a difference, maybe we should change that back to "Perfect" or "Very good" for the Wii adapter? And yes, it's not easy to improve the chart's readability while keeping enough detail... [[User:Léo|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo|talk]]) 15:37, 28 October 2016 (CEST)


I figured that audio is important, but I wish you could answer my question above! This is something I want to see:
: I figured that audio is important, but I wish you could answer my question above! This is something I want to see:


{|class="wikitable sortable width=100%"
{|class="wikitable sortable width=100%"
Line 73: Line 73:
|}
|}


This will only make sense if there are some Bluetooth adapters that are exceeded than Wii is capable of, and that limitations are not coming from Wii Remote itself. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 17:13, 28 October 2016 (CEST)
This will only make sense if there are some Bluetooth adapters that are exceeded than Wii is capable of, and that limitations are not coming from Wii Remote itself. The last column can be seen as rating system. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 17:13, 28 October 2016 (CEST)
6,576

edits