15,188
edits
 |
Progress Continues
We've already had 21536 updates since Dolphin 5.0. Keep up with Dolphin's continuing progress through the Dolphin Blog: February, March, and April 2024 Dolphin Progress Report. |
 |
The Dolphin Emulator Wiki needs your help! Dolphin can play thousands of games, and changes are happening all the time. Help us keep up! Join in and help us make this the best resource for Dolphin. |
Talk:Bluetooth Passthrough: Difference between revisions
→Simplifying the result table
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
::Alright, I'm not expert with Wii Remote + Bluetooth stuff so I didn't know that Wii's Bluetooth module is already best. IDK if "Range" column will be necessary at all if the "Audio" column receives a revamp. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 02:38, 29 October 2016 (CEST) | ::Alright, I'm not expert with Wii Remote + Bluetooth stuff so I didn't know that Wii's Bluetooth module is already best. IDK if "Range" column will be necessary at all if the "Audio" column receives a revamp. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 02:38, 29 October 2016 (CEST) | ||
Okay, my two cents: | |||
* I don't think we need to make the Wii Bluetooth Module stand out more than the others. Yes, it is our reference adapter and I agree we should "rate" other adapters based on it, but having it as the absolute best and the only "perfect" adapter is kinda wrong. For example, the AR3012 I have produces indistinguishable audio compared to a real Wii, even when far away from the console (my Wii died a long time ago but I could do a side-to-side comparison with the console from my cousin) and I dare to say its range is higher than on a real console, just can't assure it works that good with more than two Wiimotes because I only own two. From the forum posts, the BCM20702A0 also seems to surpass the Wii Bluetooth Module. In other words, I would switch back to "Perfect" for range and audio on the Wii Bluetooth Module and tag whatever adapter meets or surpasses it as Perfect too, it's just a matter of finding good adapters (and I think we will, just a matter of time), as most that were tested until now were mediocre at best. | |||
* About the table proposed by Lucario: I disagree we should remove range and regarding the audio column, your mockup actually makes things more complicated than simple. Given that, maybe we should establish an "official" testing procedure and instruct our users to rate their adapters based on the results from that testing? | |||
* About table readability: Personally I find the current one good enough. The readability is also OK, but making more clear what the values of exact column means would help | |||
- [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 03:07, 29 October 2016 (CEST) | |||