Talk:Bluetooth Passthrough: Difference between revisions

m (→‎Simplifying the result table: whoops, forgot to sign)
Line 24: Line 24:


Also, while the table is very detailed, I fear that it may become harder to read and compare adapters as more results get added. Could we add some sort of rating system as the last column, as some sort of summary? As discussed previously, it'd be star based. 0 for untested adapters; 1 for non-working adapters or broken pairing; 2 for anything that's near perfect but has some flaws; and 3 for everything that's ''as good as'' or ''better than'' the reference adapter. --[[User:Léo|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo|talk]]) 00:05, 26 October 2016 (CEST)
Also, while the table is very detailed, I fear that it may become harder to read and compare adapters as more results get added. Could we add some sort of rating system as the last column, as some sort of summary? As discussed previously, it'd be star based. 0 for untested adapters; 1 for non-working adapters or broken pairing; 2 for anything that's near perfect but has some flaws; and 3 for everything that's ''as good as'' or ''better than'' the reference adapter. --[[User:Léo|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo|talk]]) 00:05, 26 October 2016 (CEST)
: LGTM. However I would like to hear the thoughts from the other wiki admins as well (Kolano, MaJoR) since we already had some troubles with rating systems like that before. They're apparently busy and barely visits the wiki nowadays, but PMing them in the forums is probably enough to summon them to the discussion - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 07:06, 26 October 2016 (CEST)