Talk:Bluetooth Passthrough: Difference between revisions

Line 27: Line 27:
: LGTM. However I would like to hear the thoughts from the other wiki admins as well (Kolano, MaJoR) since we already had some troubles with rating systems like that before. They're apparently busy and barely visits the wiki nowadays, but PMing them in the forums is probably enough to summon them to the discussion - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 07:06, 26 October 2016 (CEST)
: LGTM. However I would like to hear the thoughts from the other wiki admins as well (Kolano, MaJoR) since we already had some troubles with rating systems like that before. They're apparently busy and barely visits the wiki nowadays, but PMing them in the forums is probably enough to summon them to the discussion - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 07:06, 26 October 2016 (CEST)


: I'm curious about the range for the Bluetooth adapters, are some exceeded than Wii is capable of, or will be always equal possibly because of the limitations coming from Wii Remote itself? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:29, 28 October 2016 (CEST)
:I'm curious about the range for the Bluetooth adapters, are some exceeded than Wii is capable of, or will be always equal possibly because of the limitations coming from Wii Remote itself? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:29, 28 October 2016 (CEST)


I highly disagree with removing "audio" quality from the table as it's the most noticeable difference between adapters.  Even on ones with "good" audio listed, it's more or less "I can hear recognizable audio" and even the best non-Wii adapter pales in comparison to the real Wii adapter.  It's just not close.
I highly disagree with removing "audio" quality from the table as it's the most noticeable difference between adapters.  Even on ones with "good" audio listed, it's more or less "I can hear recognizable audio" and even the best non-Wii adapter pales in comparison to the real Wii adapter.  It's just not close.
Line 34: Line 34:


: I didn't suggest removing audio quality from the table, but putting "good" for anything that sounds the same as with the Wii BT module. Since there's still a difference, maybe we should change that back to "Perfect" or "Very good" for the Wii adapter? And yes, it's not easy to improve the chart's readability while keeping enough detail... [[User:Léo|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo|talk]]) 15:37, 28 October 2016 (CEST)
: I didn't suggest removing audio quality from the table, but putting "good" for anything that sounds the same as with the Wii BT module. Since there's still a difference, maybe we should change that back to "Perfect" or "Very good" for the Wii adapter? And yes, it's not easy to improve the chart's readability while keeping enough detail... [[User:Léo|Léo (leoetlino)]] ([[User talk:Léo|talk]]) 15:37, 28 October 2016 (CEST)
I figured that audio is important, but I wish you could answer my question above! This is something I want to see:
{|class="wikitable sortable width=100%"
!rowspan="2"| Adapter
!rowspan="2"| VID  !!rowspan="2"| PID    !!rowspan="2"| Revision
!rowspan="2"| Works !!rowspan="2"| Stable !!rowspan="2"| Pairing
!colspan="2"| Good audio
|-
!Range vs. Wii<br /><sup>(1x Wii Remote)</sup>
!Maximum # of Wii Remotes<br /><sup>(with good audio sustained)</sup>
|-
| PCI-e Bluetooth
| ? || ? || ?
| Yes || ? || ?
| Exceeded
| 4
|-
| Class 1 Bluetooth
| ? || ? || ?
| Yes || ? || ?
| Good
| 4
|-
| Class 2 Bluetooth
| ? || ? || ?
| Yes || ? || ?
| Worse
| 2
|-
| Crappy Bluetooth
| ? || ? || ?
| Yes || ? || ?
| Bad audio
| Bad audio
|-
|}
This will only make sense if there are some Bluetooth adapters that are exceeded than Wii is capable of, and that limitations are not coming from Wii Remote itself. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 17:13, 28 October 2016 (CEST)
6,576

edits