79,227
edits
Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide: Difference between revisions
Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide (view source)
Revision as of 10:31, 30 November 2015
, 30 November 2015→Improvements?
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
!|Description | !|Description | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:3DStars3.png]]<br /><span style=" | | [[Image:3DStars3.png]]<br /><span style="display:inline-block;width:72px;text-align:center;font-size:8pt;font-weight:bold;color:#666;">Excellent</span> | ||
| Excellent: Nice stereoscopic 3D gameplay experience | | Excellent: Nice stereoscopic 3D gameplay experience | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:3DStars2.png]]<br /><span style=" | | [[Image:3DStars2.png]]<br /><span style="display:inline-block;width:72px;text-align:center;font-size:8pt;font-weight:bold;color:#666;">Acceptable</span> | ||
| Acceptable: Some visual issues | | Acceptable: Some visual issues | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:3DStars1.png]]<br /><span style=" | | [[Image:3DStars1.png]]<br /><span style="display:inline-block;width:72px;text-align:center;font-size:8pt;font-weight:bold;color:#666;">Eyesore/2D</span> | ||
| Not recommended: Eyesore and/or renders in 2D | | Not recommended: Eyesore and/or renders in 2D | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:3DStars0.png]]<br /><span style=" | | [[Image:3DStars0.png]]<br /><span style="display:inline-block;width:72px;text-align:center;font-size:8pt;font-weight:bold;color:#666;">Unknown</span> | ||
| Unknown: Has not been tested yet | | Unknown: Has not been tested yet | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
::::::::::::: I'm gonna agree with Jhonn actually. By doing this the clickable area of the image of stars is inadvertently blocked by it. | ::::::::::::: I'm gonna agree with Jhonn actually. By doing this the clickable area of the image of stars is inadvertently blocked by it. | ||
::::::::::::: The table has been revised to exactly follow MaJoR's concept. What do you think? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 03:40, 30 November 2015 (CET) | ::::::::::::: The table has been revised to exactly follow MaJoR's concept. What do you think? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 03:40, 30 November 2015 (CET) | ||
Cleaned up the text alignment, and removed the quotes. I don't think the text in the final row should appear, as we should be concerned with 3d issues generally, not just during gameplay. I also feel the ratings should associate with the level of problems that occur in a title under 3d output. So I still dislike labeling 2D titles as 1 star. Titles that can be played in 3d output mode without issues should get 3 stars, even if not making use of 3d output features. Some 2d titles may be completely wacky under 3d output, which would be listed as issues for the title and depending on the severity would grant them a different rating. Related to that, I'd suggest changing the text, perhaps: "Excellent: No problems", "Acceptable: Minor problems not impacting play","Not recommended: Problems impacting play". I definitely dislike the "Eyesore" label, we should be matching the other columns label. I presume the "Eyesore/2d" text was used because "Not recommended" extended beyond the width of 3 stars, perhaps "Unacceptable" which is about the same width would be better. Not sure if there's a better set of terms, I'm a bit uncomfortable stating what may or not be acceptable to someone else. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 09:31, 30 November 2015 (CET) | |||