Template talk:Problems/Wii MotionPlus Required: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


: The titles that use this template require either an emulated MotionPlus or a real MotionPlus. What I mean by that is that if you use an emulated Wii Remote and turn off the "Attach MotionPlus" setting, or use a real Wii Remote with no MotionPlus plugged in, the game will not work. Maybe the "add-on" wording could use some clarification? Because while you do need MotionPlus, you don't need the physical add-on anymore. [[User:JosJuice|JosJuice]] ([[User talk:JosJuice|talk]]) 21:41, 3 May 2019 (CEST)
: The titles that use this template require either an emulated MotionPlus or a real MotionPlus. What I mean by that is that if you use an emulated Wii Remote and turn off the "Attach MotionPlus" setting, or use a real Wii Remote with no MotionPlus plugged in, the game will not work. Maybe the "add-on" wording could use some clarification? Because while you do need MotionPlus, you don't need the physical add-on anymore. [[User:JosJuice|JosJuice]] ([[User talk:JosJuice|talk]]) 21:41, 3 May 2019 (CEST)
:: OK, yeah, could probably use some rewording. The current phrasing makes it seem like MotionPlus hardware is still required to me. Perhaps "This title requires Wii MotionPlus functionality." [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 23:11, 3 May 2019 (CEST)


== Non-Required Titles ==
== Non-Required Titles ==
Could there be a variant of this for games that can use Motion+ but don't require it?  Thinking of games like GoVacation.  [[User:JMC4789|JMC4789]] ([[User talk:JMC4789|talk]]) 13:43, 12 January 2017 (CET)
Could there be a variant of this for games that can use Motion+ but don't require it?  Thinking of games like GoVacation.  [[User:JMC4789|JMC4789]] ([[User talk:JMC4789|talk]]) 13:43, 12 January 2017 (CET)


Should be possible. We've tried to avoid them for most Problem templates, but perhaps we want to just use a variable the distinguish the subtlety different needed text in one template. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 01:12, 13 January 2017 (CET)
Should be possible. We've tried to avoid them for most Problem templates, but perhaps we want to just use a variable to distinguish the subtlety different needed text in one template. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 01:12, 13 January 2017 (CET)


Um... A problem template is not the right way to go about it... This problem exists because there is a hard barrier for entry that Dolphin cannot emulate - motion plus. It is vital to inform users of that with a problem tempalte! But if it is possible but not required, how is that a problem?. Users can still emulate it fine. Imo, this should be a note in the description, or a "motion plus optional" category. That would be less overt and still accessible. - [[User:MayImilae|MayImilae]] ([[User talk:MayImilae|talk]]) 12:09, 13 January 2017 (CET)
Um... A problem template is not the right way to go about it... This problem exists because there is a hard barrier for entry that Dolphin cannot emulate - motion plus. It is vital to inform users of that with a problem tempalte! But if it is possible but not required, how is that a problem?. Users can still emulate it fine. Imo, this should be a note in the description, or a "motion plus optional" category. That would be less overt and still accessible. - [[User:MayImilae|MayImilae]] ([[User talk:MayImilae|talk]]) 12:09, 13 January 2017 (CET)


: We need an "Emulation Info" shared issue template to handle these. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 06:32, 3 March 2018 (CET)
: We need an "Emulation Info" shared issue template to handle these. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 06:32, 3 March 2018 (CET)