79,225
edits
 |
Progress Continues
We've already had 21543 updates since Dolphin 5.0. Keep up with Dolphin's continuing progress through the Dolphin Blog: February, March, and April 2024 Dolphin Progress Report. |
 |
The Dolphin Emulator Wiki needs your help! Dolphin can play thousands of games, and changes are happening all the time. Help us keep up! Join in and help us make this the best resource for Dolphin. |
Template talk:Ratings: Difference between revisions
→Perfect vs Excellent
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:One thing to note is that the emulator would need to be updated too. I wanted to ask here first though. I'm pretty sure it will go well there, but it's something to consider when thinking about this. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 11:29, 29 November 2015 (CET) | :One thing to note is that the emulator would need to be updated too. I wanted to ask here first though. I'm pretty sure it will go well there, but it's something to consider when thinking about this. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 11:29, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||
:I very much dislike revising things so that the top rating isn't perfect. If some title is not perfect, then there should still be things to be worked on in the emulator related to it, and I don't what that to be lost as we start applying 5 star to imperfectly emulated titles. In theory we | :I very much dislike revising things so that the top rating isn't perfect. If some title is not perfect, then there should still be things to be worked on in the emulator related to it, and I don't what that to be lost as we start applying 5 star to imperfectly emulated titles. In theory we should have already resolved "shader compilation stuttering" resulting in imperfect ratings by migrating those problems to "Emulation Info" rather than under "Problems". [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 17:44, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||
::We should be careful with "Perfect" rating, like, should we consider a game that need specific settings as "Perfect" or if a game needs settings that'll make it run very slow but accurate, should it get a Perfect rating too? That's the main issue I'm seeing with our current system, we lack a well defined set of aspects to quickly define what specific rating a game should get. Our current definitions are too vague and leads to different understandings, like this particular case... - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 18:23, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ::We should be careful with "Perfect" rating, like, should we consider a game that need specific settings as "Perfect" or if a game needs settings that'll make it run very slow but accurate, should it get a Perfect rating too? That's the main issue I'm seeing with our current system, we lack a well defined set of aspects to quickly define what specific rating a game should get. Our current definitions are too vague and leads to different understandings, like this particular case... - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 18:23, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||