6,576
edits
Template talk:Ratings: Difference between revisions
→Perfect vs Excellent
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:::::::Hmm... How about this - we still have minor issues demoting from 5 stars to 4, so perfect would more or less just be renamed. But even like that, I still think excellent is a good thing to move to. Excellent would more or less be the same as Perfect, but with a small change - the global bugs, undiscovered bugs, and all of those things we ignore and allow us to call it perfect just because the problems area is empty? It's tolerable now, because it's NOT PERFECT! Perfect is perfect, and as long as we have shader compilation stuttering, *nothing can be perfect*. Moving to this would give us the wiggle room to actually say something is excellent and allow us to actually mean it. It wouldn't be about changing our rating system at all, it would only be about changing the word we use to describe the 5th star to better reflect how we are using it. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 17:30, 2 December 2015 (CET) | :::::::Hmm... How about this - we still have minor issues demoting from 5 stars to 4, so perfect would more or less just be renamed. But even like that, I still think excellent is a good thing to move to. Excellent would more or less be the same as Perfect, but with a small change - the global bugs, undiscovered bugs, and all of those things we ignore and allow us to call it perfect just because the problems area is empty? It's tolerable now, because it's NOT PERFECT! Perfect is perfect, and as long as we have shader compilation stuttering, *nothing can be perfect*. Moving to this would give us the wiggle room to actually say something is excellent and allow us to actually mean it. It wouldn't be about changing our rating system at all, it would only be about changing the word we use to describe the 5th star to better reflect how we are using it. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 17:30, 2 December 2015 (CET) | ||
::::::::I wonder if the shader compilation stuttering is pc performance dependent? Hypothetically, there is one badass PC with latest gen specs, will we still see stutter there? If not, then no way it will hurt the compatibility rating of the game. We shouldn't mix pc performance with compatibility rating system. Anyway, there are side effects to consider about when changing from "perfect" and its description to "excellent". People don't have the exact same mindsets as what we're having here (I'm okay with "Excellent" as long as it's exactly the same as "perfect" in the compatibility rating system, just becoming less too technical behind its meaning). Some may rate the game as 5 stars despite there's some active issues in the problem section that may seem extreme minor to them but didn't know that the 5 stars was only when the problem section is empty. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 09:49, 3 December 2015 (CET) | |||
One other area to remember in this renaming is the 5 star {{tl|VersionCompatibilityVersion}} templates. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 23:20, 2 December 2015 (CET) | One other area to remember in this renaming is the 5 star {{tl|VersionCompatibilityVersion}} templates. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 23:20, 2 December 2015 (CET) | ||