15,188
edits
Template talk:Testing: Difference between revisions
→##GHz to ## GHz mass edit: new section
(Username rename (MaJoR => MayImilae)) |
(→##GHz to ## GHz mass edit: new section) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:::::::Nice catch, I'll try to do something regarding the sort buttons. And about CPU/GPU, well, in that approach we in fact do not name the column as "device" but I think it's intuitive enough to the reader (e.g. a device of course will have a CPU/GPU so in the end it makes sense using colspan here). - [[User:mbc07|mbc07]] ([[User talk:mbc07|talk]]) 03:31, 7 December 2015 (CET) | :::::::Nice catch, I'll try to do something regarding the sort buttons. And about CPU/GPU, well, in that approach we in fact do not name the column as "device" but I think it's intuitive enough to the reader (e.g. a device of course will have a CPU/GPU so in the end it makes sense using colspan here). - [[User:mbc07|mbc07]] ([[User talk:mbc07|talk]]) 03:31, 7 December 2015 (CET) | ||
== ##GHz to ## GHz mass edit == | |||
Lately, while reviewing existing testing entries, the way we currently format the CPU speed is bothering me. AFAICT we're one of the few places that "glues" the measurement unit to the number (2GHz, 3.4GHz, etc.), while everywhere else has them separated (datasheets from Intel and AMD, tech sites and so on), and I'm strongly inclined on using the MassEditRegex extension to "unglue" them here too (2 GHz, 3.4 GHz, etc.). Any thoughts, considerations or remarks about that change? | |||