15,188
edits
Template talk:VersionCompatibilityVersion/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Template talk:VersionCompatibilityVersion/sandbox (view source)
Revision as of 04:58, 12 July 2016
, 12 July 2016→Any flaws? Dislikes?
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
| New color | | New color | ||
| Jhonn, Kolano, Lucario | | Jhonn, Kolano, Lucario | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 134: | Line 135: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| White bar for game with no revision tested | | White bar for game with no revision tested | ||
| Lucario | | Lucario, Jhonn | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Kolano | | Kolano | ||
| Line 146: | Line 147: | ||
| | | | ||
| Lucario | | Lucario | ||
| Kolano | | Kolano, Jhonn (see notes below) | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 162: | Line 163: | ||
| Lucario (if rating text stays) | | Lucario (if rating text stays) | ||
| | | | ||
| | | MaJoR | ||
| | | Jhonn | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Revision text on top | | Revision text on top | ||
| Kolano, Lucario | | Jhonn, Kolano, Lucario | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | MaJoR | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Rotated revision text | | Rotated revision text | ||
| Line 182: | Line 183: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Correcting overlapped revision text by shifting later revision to upper-left | | Correcting overlapped revision text by shifting later revision to upper-left | ||
| | | Jhonn (see notes) | ||
| Kolano | | Kolano | ||
| Lucario (if revision text on top, and no better alternative to overlap problem) | | Lucario (if revision text on top, and no better alternative to overlap problem) | ||
| | | | ||
| | | MaJoR | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Major revision points in footer | | Major revision points in footer | ||
| Kolano (Though further revs are needed) | | Kolano (Though further revs are needed), Jhonn (see notes) | ||
| | | | ||
| Lucario (if revision text on top) | | Lucario (if revision text on top) | ||
| | | | ||
| | | MaJoR | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 202: | Line 203: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | MaJoR | ||
| | | Jhonn (see notes) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Tooltip (before it was reverted) | | Tooltip (before it was reverted) | ||
| Line 215: | Line 216: | ||
I'm in support of big bold rating text as it gives users idea of what color means in the bar. It's got its font style to blend into the background of the bar. This will require the revision text to go outside of the bar. I realized that with revision text on top I can also find version compatibility in wrong order in several game pages (discovered when previewing with sandboxed templates, I can't remember which game I first discovered but [[Rayman Origins]] got similar, ordered exactly backward). [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:00, 18 June 2016 (CEST) | I'm in support of big bold rating text as it gives users idea of what color means in the bar. It's got its font style to blend into the background of the bar. This will require the revision text to go outside of the bar. I realized that with revision text on top I can also find version compatibility in wrong order in several game pages (discovered when previewing with sandboxed templates, I can't remember which game I first discovered but [[Rayman Origins]] got similar, ordered exactly backward). [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:00, 18 June 2016 (CEST) | ||
: Okay, got some time to review this, firstly, could you explain better what exactly are you referring to by "Rating text on top: white bar to be in its full width"? I didn't figure out what it might be, so I'm presumably opposing until I understand better. Secondly, about "Correcting overlapped revision text by shifting later revision to upper-left", I'm supportive of having some way to correct overlapped revisions but I think the current design isn't looking good, needs further refinement. Moving on, I'm also supportive of "Major revision points in footer", but in the future, with more releases, it'll get messy. Maybe using some kind of logarithmic instead of linear calculation to the revision position on the bar (so the recent releases get a wider space in the chart compared to old ones, like 2.0). This also relates to "Remove static "2.0" end point": I oppose having anything older than 2.0 being the "earliest", the data available on those revisions are pretty scarce and 2.0 at this point is so old to even bother trying to gather information about it (I mean, the Version Compatibility chart didn't even exist on the wiki around 2.0 release time, AFAIK -- why bother keeping track of revisions before it while we already have trouble documenting revisions released after?). That's all I had to say, for now. If you want to discuss further on some point that I'm officially opposing, let me know. - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 04:57, 12 July 2016 (CEST) | |||
== Few questions (opinions usually) == | == Few questions (opinions usually) == | ||