Template talk:VersionCompatibilityVersion/sandbox: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
::The semi-transparent background being too thick and extending behind black arrow is now fixed. I still prefer the illegible texts though. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 21:00, 4 January 2016 (CET)
::The semi-transparent background being too thick and extending behind black arrow is now fixed. I still prefer the illegible texts though. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 21:00, 4 January 2016 (CET)


:I'm not entirely sure how much of a good idea this is... we get a lot of "I tried it and it was good!" things which did not change the rating or have anything notable in them, which do not belong on the version compatibility graph. By the definition of "where compatibility change occured", if we strictly followed our own rules this is almost never an issue. The only times I can think of where it would genuinely be useful is cases like, a bug occurs and it is fixed rapidly. But the wiki often misses those anyway. :P But anyway, we shouldn't change anything until clear improvements are established, and I'm not really seeing them right now. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (CET)
:There's now no more 2.0 starting point. The first revision tested will be starting point of game's compatibility chart. Does that fulfills one of your wishlist: "possible to display 5.0-1.0 or other range of revisions"? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 09:04, 13 May 2016 (CEST)


::As of right now the styling of this new bar isn't really good, such as a wasted space above and few other ugly styling layouts. They will be ironed out eventually. By the way, there is overlap problem like this [[Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader]] that this new bar may be better for that. Let's also take narrowed browsers into consideration, where the revision labels will be overlapped even more in there. I'm hoping to implement this hover popup (like http://www.wickham43.net/hoverpopups.php) which works for Safari on iOS. Currently I and other iOS users cannot view notes or revision number of the overlapped revision. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 18:53, 4 January 2016 (CET)
I'm not entirely sure how much of a good idea this is... we get a lot of "I tried it and it was good!" things which did not change the rating or have anything notable in them, which do not belong on the version compatibility graph. By the definition of "where compatibility change occured", if we strictly followed our own rules this is almost never an issue. The only times I can think of where it would genuinely be useful is cases like, a bug occurs and it is fixed rapidly. But the wiki often misses those anyway. :P But anyway, we shouldn't change anything until clear improvements are established, and I'm not really seeing them right now. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (CET)


::Major, there are a bunch of Compatibility Graph updates to work through. We'll work on a few things here before releasing it. I'd guess your concern were partially raised by the "unsure of revision" change. Addressing such rather than ignoring it allows for a few things:
:As of right now the styling of this new bar isn't really good, such as a wasted space above and few other ugly styling layouts. They will be ironed out eventually. By the way, there is overlap problem like this [[Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader]] that this new bar may be better for that. Let's also take narrowed browsers into consideration, where the revision labels will be overlapped even more in there. I'm hoping to implement this hover popup (like http://www.wickham43.net/hoverpopups.php) which works for Safari on iOS. Currently I and other iOS users cannot view notes or revision number of the overlapped revision. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 18:53, 4 January 2016 (CET)
::*Specifically shows unclear changes. Given there are over 700 in the [:Category:VersionCompatibilityVersion Template missing notes] list there are likely many of these.
 
::*Lets us label titles /w unclear revs for investigation. The category above addresses many of them, but there are unclear entries with notes.
:Major, there are a bunch of Compatibility Graph updates to work through. We'll work on a few things here before releasing it. I'd guess your concern were partially raised by the "unsure of revision" change. Addressing such rather than ignoring it allows for a few things:
::*Generally allow us to more clearly address cleaning up things like [Ben 10 Alien Force: The Rise of Hex]. We know the rating was updated to 4 back in 2012, but don't know what revision from that timeframe corrected the crashing formerly seen.
:*Specifically shows unclear changes. Given there are over 700 in the [:Category:VersionCompatibilityVersion Template missing notes] list there are likely many of these.
::Cleaning up compatibility graphs will generally be a longer term project. Tasks like reviewing the Issues lists will help with such.
:*Lets us label titles /w unclear revs for investigation. The category above addresses many of them, but there are unclear entries with notes.
:*Generally allow us to more clearly address cleaning up things like [Ben 10 Alien Force: The Rise of Hex]. We know the rating was updated to 4 back in 2012, but don't know what revision from that timeframe corrected the crashing formerly seen.
:Cleaning up compatibility graphs will generally be a longer term project. Tasks like reviewing the Issues lists will help with such.


== Overlapping Text Correction ==
== Overlapping Text Correction ==
6,576

edits