79,221
edits
 |
Progress Continues
We've already had 21455 updates since Dolphin 5.0. Keep up with Dolphin's continuing progress through the Dolphin Blog: August, September, and October 2023 Progress Report. |
 |
The Dolphin Emulator Wiki needs your help! Dolphin can play thousands of games, and changes are happening all the time. Help us keep up! Join in and help us make this the best resource for Dolphin. |
User talk:Incassum: Difference between revisions
→AMD CPU Naming
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Ah, yes indeed, however, the models on those pages (e.g. the 1100T) are also listed on the "Processor Model Number and Feature Comparisons", where they are listed without neither "Black" nor "Black Edition", so while it seems you are right in that they sometimes type out only "Black" (great job, AMD! I see no way in which this could turn confusing), it is not part of the model name; and even on the page that you linked, it has a column which says "Model" in which neither "Black" nor "Black Edition" is mentioned. Same goes for the "Details" pages; a specific row which states "Model" is there, which lacks any mention of "Black" or "Black Edition". If you point was only to give a link to where they only write out "Black", then ok, I see they still use that: however, it is still not part of the model name... So should we abolish the usage of "BE" altogether as far as CPU naming goes, or should we have out own way of doing it? [[User:Incassum|incassum]] ([[User talk:Incassum|talk]]) 17:18, 15 January 2014 (CET) | Ah, yes indeed, however, the models on those pages (e.g. the 1100T) are also listed on the "Processor Model Number and Feature Comparisons", where they are listed without neither "Black" nor "Black Edition", so while it seems you are right in that they sometimes type out only "Black" (great job, AMD! I see no way in which this could turn confusing), it is not part of the model name; and even on the page that you linked, it has a column which says "Model" in which neither "Black" nor "Black Edition" is mentioned. Same goes for the "Details" pages; a specific row which states "Model" is there, which lacks any mention of "Black" or "Black Edition". If you point was only to give a link to where they only write out "Black", then ok, I see they still use that: however, it is still not part of the model name... So should we abolish the usage of "BE" altogether as far as CPU naming goes, or should we have out own way of doing it? [[User:Incassum|incassum]] ([[User talk:Incassum|talk]]) 17:18, 15 January 2014 (CET) | ||
Per prior discussion I've just purged the various AMD "black" identifiers, since they don't distinguish the chips in any way and are inconsistently used by AMD. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 21:52, 20 January 2014 (CET) | Per prior discussion I've just purged the various AMD "black" identifiers, since they don't distinguish the chips in any way and are inconsistently used by AMD. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 21:52, 20 January 2014 (CET) | ||
Ah, you did not explicitly state that that was the new ''modus operandi''. Excellent then, I shall adjust my future testing entries so as to conform to this attempt at a standard. Perhaps there ought to be an announcement or something of it, so as to assist future testers. [[User:Incassum|incassum]] ([[User talk:Incassum|talk]]) 23:41, 20 January 2014 (CET) | Ah, you did not explicitly state that that was the new ''modus operandi''. Excellent then, I shall adjust my future testing entries so as to conform to this attempt at a standard. Perhaps there ought to be an announcement or something of it, so as to assist future testers. [[User:Incassum|incassum]] ([[User talk:Incassum|talk]]) 23:41, 20 January 2014 (CET) | ||
Yes, there is a standards guide here somewhere. I'll need to update it, once I remember where it is. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 00:43, 21 January 2014 (CET) | |||