User talk:MayImilae: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


:Agreed that user has a history of problematic image edits, and that it's not clear his few valid submissions merit dealing with all the problem ones. No problem with the pre-existing ban, and would be OK with a longer one.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 06:08, 18 March 2015 (CET)
:Agreed that user has a history of problematic image edits, and that it's not clear his few valid submissions merit dealing with all the problem ones. No problem with the pre-existing ban, and would be OK with a longer one.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 06:08, 18 March 2015 (CET)
:That's stupid, he's breaking our conventions again, I also agree increasing ban time, to at least one month or more. If the same occur again, perma-ban is what I vote for, seen that's the 3rd time we're having problems with his edits. - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]])