File talk:Metroid.jpg: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "== Original vs Classics Version == Most of the original covers online seem to all use the same blurry source image and top out at 400x550. I did find an [https://s3.amazonaws....")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Original vs Classics Version ==
== Original vs Classics Version ==
Most of the original covers online seem to all use the same blurry source image and top out at 400x550. I did find an [https://s3.amazonaws.com/data.archive.vg/images/games/4815/f2u3z_original.jpg nicer alternate version], though it's skewed a bit yellow. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:13, 11 December 2012 (CET)
Most of the original covers online seem to all use the same blurry source image and top out at 400x550. I did find an [https://s3.amazonaws.com/data.archive.vg/images/games/4815/f2u3z_original.jpg nicer alternate version], though it's skewed a bit yellow. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:13, 11 December 2012 (CET)
Ok, EW. JPGed, hue shifted, and saturation is murdered. That is terrible. [http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d161/seando0d/gc_01.jpg Here's the one I found that I considered]. It's decent, but the JPG compression doesn't sit very well with enlarged pixel art. Honestly... that cover is just terrible. Even if we found the original cover in perfect quality PNG, the NES Classics cover is simply a better cover, and I'd still prefer it. That's subjective, so if you want to overrule me on it I won't fight you, but still... I'm an artist, I like pretty pictures. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 08:19, 11 December 2012 (CET)