Project:General Discussions: Difference between revisions

Line 16: Line 16:
:: TL;DR that's just another issue with our stone-age rating system that's bugging me for a long time and I strongly think this change would greatly improve the consistency of the current system without requiring drastic changes on the wiki, especially after the previous attempts which didn't go anywhere (e.g. the relabeling of the ratings from [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]], the 3-star rating from myself or that "blue stars" thing from [[User:Lucario|Lucario]]) - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 06:37, 16 March 2017 (CET)
:: TL;DR that's just another issue with our stone-age rating system that's bugging me for a long time and I strongly think this change would greatly improve the consistency of the current system without requiring drastic changes on the wiki, especially after the previous attempts which didn't go anywhere (e.g. the relabeling of the ratings from [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]], the 3-star rating from myself or that "blue stars" thing from [[User:Lucario|Lucario]]) - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 06:37, 16 March 2017 (CET)
::: We haven't even discussed about "blue stars" yet. I've been working on it but I can't seem to get it working the way I want it to yet, hence why I didn't feel like starting a discussion about it yet. The blue stars was supposed to avoid misleading the users thinking there'd be no (or not as much) issues with default settings. Users will quickly notice its color before they even look at how many stars there are and being misled. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 00:16, 18 March 2017 (CET)
::: We haven't even discussed about "blue stars" yet. I've been working on it but I can't seem to get it working the way I want it to yet, hence why I didn't feel like starting a discussion about it yet. The blue stars was supposed to avoid misleading the users thinking there'd be no (or not as much) issues with default settings. Users will quickly notice its color before they even look at how many stars there are and being misled. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 00:16, 18 March 2017 (CET)
::::5% of the population has some form of color blindness... - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 03:48, 24 March 2017 (CET)


:: Side note, since it seems you've been doing some Channel testing. Can you fill in the missing Channel GameIDs, Jhonn?
:: Side note, since it seems you've been doing some Channel testing. Can you fill in the missing Channel GameIDs, Jhonn?
Line 22: Line 23:


:: I still feel it will be bad for users to see titles rated as 5 star, play the game and face errors, and then fight us here on the perfect rating. I'd much prefer to focus on actually getting the INI updates made than lots of revisions here to account for things differently. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 21:02, 17 March 2017 (CET)
:: I still feel it will be bad for users to see titles rated as 5 star, play the game and face errors, and then fight us here on the perfect rating. I'd much prefer to focus on actually getting the INI updates made than lots of revisions here to account for things differently. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 21:02, 17 March 2017 (CET)
:Ack! Sorry for replying so late, I've been super busy IRL! So um... I'm opposed. If a user loads up a game, and encounters a problem, they should find the solution in the problems section (or the emulation section if it is a game bug or something), whether it is their fault or not. Remember, I support keeping problems that can still occur if the graphics config is opened (suitably labeled) - what's most important to me is informing users. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 03:48, 24 March 2017 (CET)


=== Problems / Global Problems Merging ===
=== Problems / Global Problems Merging ===