Project:General Discussions: Difference between revisions

Line 147: Line 147:
:::::::::And about the whole rating the problems thing, what's the point to keep working in something that won't see the light of the day? It's like an engineer working hard to improve the handling of a car that he already knows will never get an engine. I won't talk about this template anymore, if you want to keep working on this rating system, go ahead, after all it's '''your''' free time and you can do whatever you want with it. I just find that really pointless when you already know it won't go anywhere else besides the sandboxes. - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]])
:::::::::And about the whole rating the problems thing, what's the point to keep working in something that won't see the light of the day? It's like an engineer working hard to improve the handling of a car that he already knows will never get an engine. I won't talk about this template anymore, if you want to keep working on this rating system, go ahead, after all it's '''your''' free time and you can do whatever you want with it. I just find that really pointless when you already know it won't go anywhere else besides the sandboxes. - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]])
::::::::::Why do you keep insisting that my idea will never catch on? It's too early to make that assessment. I don't know what your problem is. At least Lucario and Kolano are giving it a chance even though they initially reject the concept. --[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|talk]]) 20:36, 7 November 2015 (CET)
::::::::::Why do you keep insisting that my idea will never catch on? It's too early to make that assessment. I don't know what your problem is. At least Lucario and Kolano are giving it a chance even though they initially reject the concept. --[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|talk]]) 20:36, 7 November 2015 (CET)
Ooooh my god. I am against the ratings concept, but um, the bars are very poorly done.  Garishly colored, not aligned properly, cuts into the paragraph, encourages the post of issues just because an issue hasn't been tagged (which is very often, and that's a problem for the If they are a work in progress, they should have been *finished* before being proposed. What is here right now is totally unacceptable! Plus there's the fact that ratings are subjective, and it adds to maintenance of issues... I definitely do not support this. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 14:00, 8 November 2015 (CET)
Well... I am against the ratings concept, but um, the bars are very poorly done.  Garishly colored, not aligned properly, cuts into the paragraph, encourages the creation of issue rports just because an issue hasn't been tagged (which happens often), and that's a problem for the issue tracker. If the bars are a work in progress, they should have been *finished* before being proposed. What is here right now is totally unacceptable! Plus there's the fact that ratings are subjective, and it adds to maintenance of issues... I don't like moving the 16:9 bit to the infobox either, that just seems silly to me... There are only 60 or so games would use it out of 3000, so it would break consistency. Adding it everywhere for consistency just leaves useless information in over 3000 pages, so 60 can have it, which is even more silly! I don't really see how any of these changes improves anything, and lots of ways they make things worse... - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 14:00, 8 November 2015 (CET)


=== Global Replacement Request ===
=== Global Replacement Request ===