User talk:Lucario: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 96: Line 96:
::::::'''Lucario:''' I may have accidentally jumped into the category during the mass revert, but yes, it'll still be needed, even with the automatic method. And about letting the first approach go live, it would just be more work to you (by adding |fixed everywhere else, not just the initial set) and more work to us to actually go reverting that when the automatic approach goes live. Also, why wouldn't it go live when the change needed for the automatic approach is fairly simple (after having the extension installed)? - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]])
::::::'''Lucario:''' I may have accidentally jumped into the category during the mass revert, but yes, it'll still be needed, even with the automatic method. And about letting the first approach go live, it would just be more work to you (by adding |fixed everywhere else, not just the initial set) and more work to us to actually go reverting that when the automatic approach goes live. Also, why wouldn't it go live when the change needed for the automatic approach is fairly simple (after having the extension installed)? - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]])
:::::::Yes, it was more work for me, and it's already near-completed, and yes it may have been more work for you to revert them, but doesn't seem that hard, right? After realizing the 2nd approach is possible, I've regretted implementing a such thing with 1st approach, and was such let down that you've reverted them that immediate. We would have left them as is until the 2nd approach has been implemented but it's too late. They're already reverted. I was confused and didn't know why the consensus was needed to continue until I've realized the better solution that could work the same way. We all make mistake. Looking forward to the multi-category extension getting implemented someday soon! [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:37, 12 November 2015 (CET)
:::::::Yes, it was more work for me, and it's already near-completed, and yes it may have been more work for you to revert them, but doesn't seem that hard, right? After realizing the 2nd approach is possible, I've regretted implementing a such thing with 1st approach, and was such let down that you've reverted them that immediate. We would have left them as is until the 2nd approach has been implemented but it's too late. They're already reverted. I was confused and didn't know why the consensus was needed to continue until I've realized the better solution that could work the same way. We all make mistake. Looking forward to the multi-category extension getting implemented someday soon! [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:37, 12 November 2015 (CET)
:::::::Huh... If the multi-cat extension was enabled, how would we still be able to find the active problems in the game pages? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 02:07, 14 November 2015 (CET)
6,576

edits