79,225
edits
 |
Progress Continues
We've already had 21543 updates since Dolphin 5.0. Keep up with Dolphin's continuing progress through the Dolphin Blog: February, March, and April 2024 Dolphin Progress Report. |
 |
The Dolphin Emulator Wiki needs your help! Dolphin can play thousands of games, and changes are happening all the time. Help us keep up! Join in and help us make this the best resource for Dolphin. |
Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide: Difference between revisions
Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide (view source)
Revision as of 17:47, 28 November 2015
, 28 November 2015→Improvements?
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:I am against stars. The silly stars are a huge problem for emulation rating, even when it's much simpler that 3D! 3D is so absurdly complicated! When this was brought up the stars idea was discussed, and I pushed strongly against it, and we settled for the current text technique. I think it should stay as such. | :I am against stars. The silly stars are a huge problem for emulation rating, even when it's much simpler that 3D! 3D is so absurdly complicated! When this was brought up the stars idea was discussed, and I pushed strongly against it, and we settled for the current text technique. I think it should stay as such. | ||
:I'm also pretty wary of it showing up in pages. Notice how this page here ''describes'' the problems with 3D very clearly, as well as having rating. The rating *and* descriptions would need to be integrated into each page, and I have no idea how to do that without looking awkward. Well, the only idea I've come up with is putting it into Emulation Information, but at that point, couldn't you just integrate the rating with the post? - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 15:57, 28 November 2015 (CET) | :I'm also pretty wary of it showing up in pages. Notice how this page here ''describes'' the problems with 3D very clearly, as well as having rating. The rating *and* descriptions would need to be integrated into each page, and I have no idea how to do that without looking awkward. Well, the only idea I've come up with is putting it into Emulation Information, but at that point, couldn't you just integrate the rating with the post? - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 15:57, 28 November 2015 (CET) | ||
:: This info needs to be assessed for every single title. The table here (and the page itself) will eventually become too unwieldy to be useful (i.e. once it contains multiple thousands of rows). The text ratings have the exact same issue as stars, in either case we need rules around how the ratings are assigned and we currently don't have any. My thoughts here had been to add the additional rating to the info box (though it could be moved elsewhere) and include the detailed instructions for problematic pages in the "Enhancements" section of each title. Likely prefixed with a {{tl|Problems}} template that would cover 3d info in brief and link back to this page for more specific details around 3d output support. As I think was discussed previously, with no linkages here no one is likely to ever find/see the 3d info provided. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 16:47, 28 November 2015 (CET) | |||