Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide: Difference between revisions

Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide (view source)

395 bytes added , 28 November 2015

5,502

edits

Revision as of 13:53, 28 November 2015 (view source) Lucario (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:57, 28 November 2015 (view source) MayImilae (talk \| contribs) (→‎Improvements?) Newer edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:::::::Oh right, I somehow thought you said to give 0 stars to the titles rated as "not recommended" in 3D rating compatibility. (I need a "not support 3d =/= not recommended" lesson apparently) I'd still like to give "2D" two stars to coincide with first digit in parameter "2". [[User:Lucario\|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario\|talk]]) 12:53, 28 November 2015 (CET)		:::::::Oh right, I somehow thought you said to give 0 stars to the titles rated as "not recommended" in 3D rating compatibility. (I need a "not support 3d =/= not recommended" lesson apparently) I'd still like to give "2D" two stars to coincide with first digit in parameter "2". [[User:Lucario\|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario\|talk]]) 12:53, 28 November 2015 (CET)

			:I am against stars. The silly stars are a huge problem for emulation rating, even when it's much simpler that 3D! 3D is so absurdly complicated! When this was brought up the stars idea was discussed, and I pushed strongly against it, and we settled for the current text technique. I think it should stay as such. - [[User:MaJoR\|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR\|talk]]) 15:57, 28 November 2015 (CET)