Template talk:Infobox VG: Difference between revisions

Line 23: Line 23:


::::There's one more thing I'd like to discuss about - Whether to go with or without quotation marks. I take it that it's best to go without quotation marks when going inline on the stars, but that concept never went live. I'd prefer to go with quotation marks personally. The quotation marks can be used as to emphasize a word as possible irony or sarcasm, to avoid validity issues. I hope I'm making myself clear. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 04:04, 21 December 2015 (CET)
::::There's one more thing I'd like to discuss about - Whether to go with or without quotation marks. I take it that it's best to go without quotation marks when going inline on the stars, but that concept never went live. I'd prefer to go with quotation marks personally. The quotation marks can be used as to emphasize a word as possible irony or sarcasm, to avoid validity issues. I hope I'm making myself clear. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 04:04, 21 December 2015 (CET)
:::::Seems like needless punctuation to me. We aren't quoting anyone, and I'd prefer if the ratings were not taken as indicating "irony or sarcasm". If it's emphasis your after we can look into further boldening the text.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 06:20, 21 December 2015 (CET)


== Docs ==
== Docs ==