Template talk:Ratings: Difference between revisions

Line 98: Line 98:


So, conclusions? I read the new "no relevant issues" proposal and meh, looks like we're exchanging "six" for "half a dozen", essentially not changing anything. Considering Dolphin is an emulator of a complex console, unless some day it becomes an accuracy focused emulator (like higan), calling the top-most rating as Perfect doesn't look completely right to me. In other words, my vote goes now to Excellent as well - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 20:27, 10 December 2015 (CET)
So, conclusions? I read the new "no relevant issues" proposal and meh, looks like we're exchanging "six" for "half a dozen", essentially not changing anything. Considering Dolphin is an emulator of a complex console, unless some day it becomes an accuracy focused emulator (like higan), calling the top-most rating as Perfect doesn't look completely right to me. In other words, my vote goes now to Excellent as well - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 20:27, 10 December 2015 (CET)
:At least "No relevant issues" is better than saying "No issues at all!". The latter one sounds misleading and childish so I'm in for this change, whether it's simply a placeholder for the upcoming better description. Have any idea how to write description for "Excellent" also? I'm ok for either but may blur the bar between "perfect" and "playable" and that's something we're afraid of. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 00:28, 11 December 2015 (CET)


== Regions and Ratings ==
== Regions and Ratings ==
6,576

edits