Template talk:Ratings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 96: Line 96:


::::: Yes, we would. I'd need to look through again but I think the current places we have violators are likely due to the global problem only effecting the PAL versions of things. That's a separate thing we need to discuss, I'll add a topic below. In any case, where we have global problems today there aren't enough titles with ratings for it to be much of an issue. I guess it could be problematic at some future point /w more global problems defined. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 09:01, 7 December 2015 (CET)
::::: Yes, we would. I'd need to look through again but I think the current places we have violators are likely due to the global problem only effecting the PAL versions of things. That's a separate thing we need to discuss, I'll add a topic below. In any case, where we have global problems today there aren't enough titles with ratings for it to be much of an issue. I guess it could be problematic at some future point /w more global problems defined. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 09:01, 7 December 2015 (CET)
So, conclusions? I read the new "no relevant issues" proposal and meh, looks like we're exchanging "six" for "half a dozen", essentially not changing anything. Considering Dolphin is an emulator of a complex console, unless some day it becomes an accuracy focused emulator (like higan), calling the top-most rating as Perfect doesn't look completely right to me. In other words, my vote goes now to Excellent as well - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 20:27, 10 December 2015 (CET)


== Regions and Ratings ==
== Regions and Ratings ==

Navigation menu