15,188
edits
Template talk:VersionCompatibilityVersion/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Template talk:VersionCompatibilityVersion/sandbox (view source)
Revision as of 23:42, 15 July 2016
, 15 July 2016→Any flaws? Dislikes?
| Line 237: | Line 237: | ||
:: I disagree on purging pre-2.0 information from the version compatibility. We need to keep a record of old data somewhere, and it is hidden so it doesn't hurt anything. EDIT: I guess the history is a record of that... but having that little bit of data in version compatibility is very useful in giving us an idea of how far back to go in the history. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 21:54, 15 July 2016 (CEST) | :: I disagree on purging pre-2.0 information from the version compatibility. We need to keep a record of old data somewhere, and it is hidden so it doesn't hurt anything. EDIT: I guess the history is a record of that... but having that little bit of data in version compatibility is very useful in giving us an idea of how far back to go in the history. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 21:54, 15 July 2016 (CEST) | ||
::: Okay, I'm alone on this point, pre-2.0 info stay then. However, the math responsible for positioning the revisions should absolutely be remade before going outside of the sandbox. If you use the current design on a page that includes a chart entry for r805, for example, the actual math will put r805 at the rightmost and push 2.0 marker nearly the middle of the graph and that's baaad. I didn't took a look at the code behind the positioning but current math seems based on a linear approach. Using a logarithmic math probably fixes this... - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 23:40, 15 July 2016 (CEST) | |||
== Few questions (opinions usually) == | == Few questions (opinions usually) == | ||