User talk:LobStoR: Difference between revisions

User talk:LobStoR (view source)

Revision as of 23:46, 23 June 2011

659 bytes added , 23 June 2011

no edit summary

MayImilae

Bureaucrats, Administrators

5,502

edits

Revision as of 05:10, 23 June 2011 (view source) Kolano (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:46, 23 June 2011 (view source) MayImilae (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 28:		Line 28:

	::In any case, I'd like to keep Talk pages to current/relevant discussion and put irrelevant content in the bin. I understand that page deletion has an adverse effect on page histories, and will accept tagging ongoing relevant discussions with a category to avoid deletions. I'd like to keep the irrelevant discussion out of search though, and would prefer to continue to blank irrelevant discussion to do so (though I'm not resilient to disputes/reversions, as "relevance" can be a sticky subject). I'm OK with use of archive pages to preserve irrelevant discussion, if we can't agree on the former direction.[[User:Kolano\|Kolano]] 06:52, 23 June 2011 (CEST) P.S.-Thanks for all you're recent assistance on the wiki, it's very appreciated.		::In any case, I'd like to keep Talk pages to current/relevant discussion and put irrelevant content in the bin. I understand that page deletion has an adverse effect on page histories, and will accept tagging ongoing relevant discussions with a category to avoid deletions. I'd like to keep the irrelevant discussion out of search though, and would prefer to continue to blank irrelevant discussion to do so (though I'm not resilient to disputes/reversions, as "relevance" can be a sticky subject). I'm OK with use of archive pages to preserve irrelevant discussion, if we can't agree on the former direction.[[User:Kolano\|Kolano]] 06:52, 23 June 2011 (CEST) P.S.-Thanks for all you're recent assistance on the wiki, it's very appreciated.

			:Since you guys are actively talking about this, I wanted to give you a headsup. In the previous windwaker discussion, it was debated whether the older revisions element should be removed. A decision was reached- erm, no objections were raised, to keep it till 3.0 comes out, because 2.0 still uses the method described in older revisions. So I left the relevant bits in the talk after blanking. It is not exactly active discussion, but a useful bit of information nevertheless. Should it stay? [http://wiki.dolphin-emulator.com/index.php?title=Talk:The_Legend_of_Zelda:_The_Wind_Waker Talk:The Wind Waker] -- [[User:MaJoR\|MaJoR]] 01:46, 24 June 2011 (CEST)