57
edits
User talk:Mbc07: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
::::::: Okay, there's some specific points I would like to talk on this one: | ::::::: Okay, there's some specific points I would like to talk on this one: | ||
::::::: * Why should we be consistent with other wikis? Our test entries currently omits the .0 from the CPU speeds consistently on our entire wiki and that's all. There's no compromise nor we need to be consistent with how CPU speeds are handled on other wikis. | ::::::: * Why should we be consistent with other wikis? Our test entries currently omits the .0 from the CPU speeds consistently on our entire wiki and that's all. There's no compromise nor we need to be consistent with how CPU speeds are handled on other wikis. | ||
:::::::: It's going to be how you want it to be, and there will be no compromise. I know that now. I gave several reasons why I believed it would be better to include .0 for CPU speeds near the beginning of this discussion (uniformity, visual coherency, consistency with the CPU manufacturers), but at the time I didn't have a good understanding of how this wiki operates. If/when you do update the guidelines, it may be helpful for other users to also update the section on disagreements to better reflect how they are handled here. [[User:Flang|Flang]] ([[User talk:Flang|talk]]) 16:50, 2 May 2017 (CEST) | |||
::::::: * You keep referring to our own guidelines as if we're not consistent with it, even though we are. Perhaps we should rephrase that CPU speed section to better reflect how these speeds got handled during all those years since the way it's written currently leads you to that kind of "loose" interpretation? | ::::::: * You keep referring to our own guidelines as if we're not consistent with it, even though we are. Perhaps we should rephrase that CPU speed section to better reflect how these speeds got handled during all those years since the way it's written currently leads you to that kind of "loose" interpretation? | ||
:::::::: I've never stated nor implied that your preferences are not consistent with the wiki guidelines, only that mine are consistent. Please do not misinterpret my statements. [[User:Flang|Flang]] ([[User talk:Flang|talk]]) 16:50, 2 May 2017 (CEST) | |||
::::::: * About your future test entries, you should only stop putting CPU speed on your entries if/when this discussion get settled and the conventions get updated to reflect that. Even through there are intentions to simply purge the CPU speed from all test entries, nothing here has been officially approved. [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 06:44, 2 May 2017 (CEST) | ::::::: * About your future test entries, you should only stop putting CPU speed on your entries if/when this discussion get settled and the conventions get updated to reflect that. Even through there are intentions to simply purge the CPU speed from all test entries, nothing here has been officially approved. [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 06:44, 2 May 2017 (CEST) | ||
:::::::: What are the current conventions regarding test entries where the CPU speed is not included? There are several such entries across the wiki. If the guidelines are such that we must either include the CPU speed or not make test entries at all, then I'll refrain from doing so. It would be a waste of time to go through the work of testing software on Dolphin if the data I provided would simply be deleted entirely. [[User:Flang|Flang]] ([[User talk:Flang|talk]]) 16:50, 2 May 2017 (CEST) | |||