79,221
edits
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
Am I mistaken on how the processor names should be written? It makes sense to me to include the .0 at the end because '4GHz' could be misinterpreted, as if a tester accidentally abbreviated the entry. | Am I mistaken on how the processor names should be written? It makes sense to me to include the .0 at the end because '4GHz' could be misinterpreted, as if a tester accidentally abbreviated the entry. | ||
My presumption is that general preference would be to omit needless excess specifications. 4 is 4.0 is 4.00 is 4.0000. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 05:42, 29 April 2017 (CEST) |