57
edits
User talk:Mbc07: Difference between revisions
→Formatting guidelines for processor speed under testing
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
:: I'm a bit dubious that any overclocking is likely to effect things from a support/compatibility perspective enough for us to worry about. The clean-up would be fairly simple if speed indicators were just purged. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:11, 29 April 2017 (CEST) | :: I'm a bit dubious that any overclocking is likely to effect things from a support/compatibility perspective enough for us to worry about. The clean-up would be fairly simple if speed indicators were just purged. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:11, 29 April 2017 (CEST) | ||
:: @[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] If the guidelines were changed so that speed would not be included anymore, then certainly I would follow that. But at this time they instruct us to include the speed of the CPU ("Indicate CPU speed with a "@ #GHz" postfix listing the stock or overclocked frequency"). | |||
:: Regarding the formatting of the CPU speed - Though it is a minor detail, it's important to me that my own testing entries include the .0 appended at the end, It looks neater, more uniform with the CPU speeds of other testers, and it is officially how both Intel and AMD classify their products. Is that acceptable to you, until the guidelines are changed? [[User:Flang|Flang]] ([[User talk:Flang|talk]]) 08:18, 29 April 2017 (CEST) | |||