User talk:Miksel12: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


:::: "Due to an enhancement"? Right, there are lot of ways to name it, "enhancement issue", "issue of an enhancement", etc... even just an "issue" or "problem" can work. I get that going under problems means that'll afflict compatibility rating of a game, so why not let emu info have it? And uh, it's slashed, so it won't affect compatibility rating any more. Does it still has to go under Enhancements? There's problem template that can pick it up for 6.0 cleanup. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 16:09, 23 June 2019 (CEST)
:::: "Due to an enhancement"? Right, there are lot of ways to name it, "enhancement issue", "issue of an enhancement", etc... even just an "issue" or "problem" can work. I get that going under problems means that'll afflict compatibility rating of a game, so why not let emu info have it? And uh, it's slashed, so it won't affect compatibility rating any more. Does it still has to go under Enhancements? There's problem template that can pick it up for 6.0 cleanup. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 16:09, 23 June 2019 (CEST)
::::: If it were up to me, we'd just track all problems under problems. But since folks want to distinguish between "enhancement" related issues that will be ignored, and others this is what we have. Moving things back and forth between those sections based on if they are resolved or not just leads to confusion as to where specific issues belong.
::::: Regarding the secondary template, yes a template similar to the current Problems one but for the Enhancements section; which would generate a separate set of similar categories as the Problems one does for resolved enhancement problems. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 20:03, 23 June 2019 (CEST)