User talk:Miksel12: Difference between revisions

User talk:Miksel12 (view source)

Revision as of 13:05, 23 June 2019

7 bytes added , 23 June 2019

m

no edit summary

Lucario

6,576

edits

Revision as of 13:04, 23 June 2019 (view source) Lucario (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:05, 23 June 2019 (view source) Lucario (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: The particular issue does belong under Enhancements. However, a reason to move it would be to align with the way problems are tracked by the Problems template, which should aid with clean-up post the 6.0 release. Really we should add a secondary Enhancements template to handle them similarly (even though there is no commitment to resolve enhancement issues). I've been too lazy to go through the gyrations to set one up though. [[User:Kolano\|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano\|talk]]) 04:45, 23 June 2019 (CEST)		: The particular issue does belong under Enhancements. However, a reason to move it would be to align with the way problems are tracked by the Problems template, which should aid with clean-up post the 6.0 release. Really we should add a secondary Enhancements template to handle them similarly (even though there is no commitment to resolve enhancement issues). I've been too lazy to go through the gyrations to set one up though. [[User:Kolano\|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano\|talk]]) 04:45, 23 June 2019 (CEST)

	:: What do you mean a secondary Enhancements template? Is it that Problems template but for ~~enhancements~~? I want to know what happened when Miksel took the entry back into Enhancements. [[User:Lucario\|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario\|talk]]) 13:03, 23 June 2019 (CEST)		:: What do you mean a secondary Enhancements template? Is it that Problems template but for enhancement entries? I want to know what happened when Miksel took the entry back into Enhancements. [[User:Lucario\|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario\|talk]]) 13:03, 23 June 2019 (CEST)