Project:General Discussions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:These ratings will help people with lower PC specs more quickly than just reading a wall of text so that way they can still enjoy the games without it being a resource hog just to keep the emulation 100% accurate at all times. I would know because I am currently in that state. | :These ratings will help people with lower PC specs more quickly than just reading a wall of text so that way they can still enjoy the games without it being a resource hog just to keep the emulation 100% accurate at all times. I would know because I am currently in that state. | ||
:I don't consider any of what I am doing a waste of effort. I'm trying to address the core problems this wiki is facing; keeping things up-to-date and user-friendly by trying to implement things I know works on other Wikis, such as [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net Bulbapedia] and [http://www.wiibrew.org WiiBrew], but make them feel right for Dolphin Wiki specifically. --[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|talk]]) 20:08, 7 November 2015 (CET) | :I don't consider any of what I am doing a waste of effort. I'm trying to address the core problems this wiki is facing; keeping things up-to-date and user-friendly by trying to implement things I know works on other Wikis, such as [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net Bulbapedia] and [http://www.wiibrew.org WiiBrew], but make them feel right for Dolphin Wiki specifically. --[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|talk]]) 20:08, 7 November 2015 (CET) | ||
==== | ====Counts of Pages By # of Issues==== | ||
My point on the ~650 pages with issues was too fold; 1) It will take a while for anyone to review and populate things across that many page 2) Given the number of titles on the site that are not rated Perfect, there is a huge gap in simply capturing problems (I'd prefer to focus on capturing more, than rating ones that are currently captured). | |||
Here's a full rundown of the the number of pages based on their approximate number of problems... | |||
*Only 1: 364 | |||
*Only 2: 149 | |||
*Only 3: 54 | |||
*Only 4: 28 | |||
*Only 5: 12 | |||
*Only 6: 14 | |||
*Only 7: 3 | |||
*Only 8: 6 | |||
*Only 9: 5 | |||
*Only 10: 2 | |||
*Only 11: 1 | |||
*Only 12: 2 | |||
*Only 13: 4 | |||
*Only 14: 2 | |||
*Only 15: 1 | |||
...I remain unclear that a "wall of text" is actually a problem, as there are so few pages that have enough issues for there to be a "wall of text" (i.e. there are only ~7 pages that have 7 issue or more). I remain unconvinced based on the low number of pages with many issues, that assigning significance ratings to things is of much importance. There might be some meta-data for problems it might be worth capturing though like the first/last revision known to include a problem. That might be a better way to assign a non-arbitrary rating for things that would help to identify problems that may need re-review as we could subtract that revision from the current revision and work out an age/age since review for each problem. That info is really only useful to editors though, so I'm not sure it needs a banner displayed rather than something that would invisibly spit out relevant categories. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 21:32, 7 November 2015 (CET) | |||
====Problem Ratings==== | ====Problem Ratings==== | ||
One minor point, though I'm not supportive of the ratings banners, stylistically they probably should be floated right to sit beside each heading. | One minor point, though I'm not supportive of the ratings banners, stylistically they probably should be floated right to sit beside each heading. | ||