Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


:::::I'm okay with just three stars: Bad, OK, Excellent. Though I'd like to hear from JMC47 about this since it was him who made up five possibilies in the rating column I think. We'd still need to make up distinguish between "untested" and "not recommended". If we can't even give one star to "not recommend" then this will subtract a star down to just two sets of stars. :/ [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 11:28, 28 November 2015 (CET)
:::::I'm okay with just three stars: Bad, OK, Excellent. Though I'd like to hear from JMC47 about this since it was him who made up five possibilies in the rating column I think. We'd still need to make up distinguish between "untested" and "not recommended". If we can't even give one star to "not recommend" then this will subtract a star down to just two sets of stars. :/ [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 11:28, 28 November 2015 (CET)
::::::I'm OK with 1 star for "Not Recommended", presuming that means 3d output is significantly broken. I was just uncomfortable using that label for 2d titles that don't output 3d, but work just fine under 3d output modes. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 12:32, 28 November 2015 (CET)