Template talk:Config: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
: Yeah, we need to clean up ntscj, the only title currently requiring it is [[Kururin Squash!]]. Presuming we can clean it up with current settings I think we should probably just purge the old settings once the clean up is complete. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 04:49, 9 February 2022 (CET)
: Yeah, we need to clean up ntscj, the only title currently requiring it is [[Kururin Squash!]]. Presuming we can clean it up with current settings I think we should probably just purge the old settings once the clean up is complete. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 04:49, 9 February 2022 (CET)


::::Would it be safe to assume [[Kururin Squash!]] can just switch to the new setting parameter? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:57, 11 February 2022 (CET)
:: Would it be safe to assume [[Kururin Squash!]] can just switch to the new setting parameter? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:57, 11 February 2022 (CET)
 
== [[Template:Config/sandbox#Issues]] ==
I feel that they can be ignored as it would be an overdo if any one of these are to be resolved, they are there for producing quality categories against misformatted settings. I hope it wouldn't be too confusing when trying to add future new settings into config template. I think we need to add editor notes somewhere. Anyone else okay with it? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 03:08, 11 February 2022 (CET)
 
== [[Template:Config/sandbox#Features]] ==
Is everything a good addition? I feel they're ready to ship outside the sandbox. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 03:08, 11 February 2022 (CET)
 
== Relabelling Settings ==
Should we relabel settings to reflect current Dolphin UI? Should parameters also follow up? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 03:08, 11 February 2022 (CET)