Template talk:Problems/Wii MotionPlus Required: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== This title requires the Wii MotionPlus add-on == | |||
Confused by "This title requires the Wii MotionPlus add-on", isn't that no longer the case since MotionPlus is now emulated? I presume some titles may still not work well with the the MotionPlus emulation, but that should probably be handled alternately. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 09:05, 3 May 2019 (CEST) | |||
== Non-Required Titles == | |||
Could there be a variant of this for games that can use Motion+ but don't require it? Thinking of games like GoVacation. [[User:JMC4789|JMC4789]] ([[User talk:JMC4789|talk]]) 13:43, 12 January 2017 (CET) | Could there be a variant of this for games that can use Motion+ but don't require it? Thinking of games like GoVacation. [[User:JMC4789|JMC4789]] ([[User talk:JMC4789|talk]]) 13:43, 12 January 2017 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 09:05, 3 May 2019
This title requires the Wii MotionPlus add-on
Confused by "This title requires the Wii MotionPlus add-on", isn't that no longer the case since MotionPlus is now emulated? I presume some titles may still not work well with the the MotionPlus emulation, but that should probably be handled alternately. Kolano (talk) 09:05, 3 May 2019 (CEST)
Non-Required Titles
Could there be a variant of this for games that can use Motion+ but don't require it? Thinking of games like GoVacation. JMC4789 (talk) 13:43, 12 January 2017 (CET)
Should be possible. We've tried to avoid them for most Problem templates, but perhaps we want to just use a variable the distinguish the subtlety different needed text in one template. Kolano (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2017 (CET)
Um... A problem template is not the right way to go about it... This problem exists because there is a hard barrier for entry that Dolphin cannot emulate - motion plus. It is vital to inform users of that with a problem tempalte! But if it is possible but not required, how is that a problem?. Users can still emulate it fine. Imo, this should be a note in the description, or a "motion plus optional" category. That would be less overt and still accessible. - MayImilae (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2017 (CET)