79,221
edits
 |
Progress Continues
We've already had 21453 updates since Dolphin 5.0. Keep up with Dolphin's continuing progress through the Dolphin Blog: August, September, and October 2023 Progress Report. |
 |
The Dolphin Emulator Wiki needs your help! Dolphin can play thousands of games, and changes are happening all the time. Help us keep up! Join in and help us make this the best resource for Dolphin. |
Project:To Do/git: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==GIT Switch Discussion== | == GIT Switch Discussion == | ||
So, it looks like Dolphin is switching from svn to git. While this is a purely development decision, it has serious impact on us here at the wiki regarding how we refer to revisions. There is no longer a sequential revision number system that increments with each commit. Love it or not, git is here to stay: | So, it looks like Dolphin is switching from svn to git. While this is a purely development decision, it has serious impact on us here at the wiki regarding how we refer to revisions. There is no longer a sequential revision number system that increments with each commit. Love it or not, git is here to stay: | ||
{{forum|Forum Topic|tid=18677}} | |||
* I specifically asked for a system that continues the existing rev numbers, either by automation or by calling a commit 'revision 77xx'. So far, at least neobrain has expressed his dislike for this idea. | * I specifically asked for a system that continues the existing rev numbers, either by automation or by calling a commit 'revision 77xx'. So far, at least neobrain has expressed his dislike for this idea. | ||
[http://code.google.com/p/dolphin-emu/source/detail?r=683c78a5ab4e0da4eb1b9766456a4853c48b0bc0|Google Code Discussion] | [http://code.google.com/p/dolphin-emu/source/detail?r=683c78a5ab4e0da4eb1b9766456a4853c48b0bc0|Google Code Discussion] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Regarding the Version Compatibility template, it's current format could be preserved by associating revisions with dates and then revising the template to use some date parsing rather than the raw version numbers to scale the entries. Setting up the associations would be a PITA, but I'm guessing it could be extracted from GIT and appropriate wiki content parsed out without too much trouble. However, maintaining such seem problematic, so I'm guessing we'll likely end up with just a shaded table.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] 06:29, 22 August 2011 (CEST) | Regarding the Version Compatibility template, it's current format could be preserved by associating revisions with dates and then revising the template to use some date parsing rather than the raw version numbers to scale the entries. Setting up the associations would be a PITA, but I'm guessing it could be extracted from GIT and appropriate wiki content parsed out without too much trouble. However, maintaining such seem problematic, so I'm guessing we'll likely end up with just a shaded table.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] 06:29, 22 August 2011 (CEST) | ||
=== New Rev Formatting === | |||
Okay, I think I get what they're talking about with the new rev formatting, and I think it's something we can work with. I just compiled brand-new Dolphin, and this is what is in my title bar: | |||
Dolphin [HEAD] 3.0-59 | |||
From my understanding, what this means is that this is the 59th build of Dolphin 3.0 in HEAD. First, I think that all of our reports should be based out of the head, or mainline trunk of Dolphin. Side-trunks can be mentioned in the Problems section or whatnot, but it opens up a whole different can of worms to track multiple trunks. | |||
However, the 3.0-59 part I think we can work with. So, I think we can treat it as 3.0 (which is rev 7617) plus 59 is rev 7676. Now, we should definitely give the user the ability to enter "3.0-64", but as far as [[Template:VersionRevision]], I think it could be treated for logic purposes as 7676. This would allow us to continue using the VersionCompatibility bar chart, and would let the users enter what they're seeing in the titlebar of Dolphin. | |||
If we can agree that this is a good way to handle it, and if the devs keep to this numbering system, I'll start work in [[Template:VersionRevision/sandbox]] to get the logic setup. I tell ya, I'm having to learn more and more wiki-foo every day I work on this. =P | |||
Your thoughts? | |||
--[[User:Keller999|Keller999]] 12:15, 23 August 2011 (CEST) | |||
I haven't been able to work out means to do the sort of text parsing that would been needed for that nicely, though a setup with the base rev and increment specified as separate parameters would probably work.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] 15:53, 23 August 2011 (CEST) | |||
Right now the best thing is to wait until builds are steadily being built again at this wiki home site, and after that use the new (semi-official) convention, whatever it's going to be, unless one of you guys is mamario and can tell us beforehand what's it going to be. [[User:Otomo|Otomo]] 09:31, 27 August 2011 (CEST) | |||