Project:To Do/git: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==GIT Switch Discussion==
== GIT Switch Discussion ==
So, it looks like Dolphin is switching from svn to git.  While this is a purely development decision, it has serious impact on us here at the wiki regarding how we refer to revisions.  There is no longer a sequential revision number system that increments with each commit.  Love it or not, git is here to stay:
So, it looks like Dolphin is switching from svn to git.  While this is a purely development decision, it has serious impact on us here at the wiki regarding how we refer to revisions.  There is no longer a sequential revision number system that increments with each commit.  Love it or not, git is here to stay:


[http://forums.dolphin-emulator.com/showthread.php?tid=18677|Forum Topic]
{{forum|Forum Topic|tid=18677}}
* I specifically asked for a system that continues the existing rev numbers, either by automation or by calling a commit 'revision 77xx'.  So far, at least neobrain has expressed his dislike for this idea.   
* I specifically asked for a system that continues the existing rev numbers, either by automation or by calling a commit 'revision 77xx'.  So far, at least neobrain has expressed his dislike for this idea.   
[http://code.google.com/p/dolphin-emu/source/detail?r=683c78a5ab4e0da4eb1b9766456a4853c48b0bc0|Google Code Discussion]
[http://code.google.com/p/dolphin-emu/source/detail?r=683c78a5ab4e0da4eb1b9766456a4853c48b0bc0|Google Code Discussion]
Line 40: Line 40:


I haven't been able to work out means to do the sort of text parsing that would been needed for that nicely, though a setup with the base rev and increment specified as separate parameters would probably work.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] 15:53, 23 August 2011 (CEST)
I haven't been able to work out means to do the sort of text parsing that would been needed for that nicely, though a setup with the base rev and increment specified as separate parameters would probably work.[[User:Kolano|Kolano]] 15:53, 23 August 2011 (CEST)
Right now the best thing is to wait until builds are steadily being built again at this wiki home site, and after that use the new (semi-official) convention, whatever it's going to be, unless one of you guys is mamario and can tell us beforehand what's it going to be. [[User:Otomo|Otomo]] 09:31, 27 August 2011 (CEST)

Navigation menu