Super Mario Galaxy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 71: Line 71:
{{testing/entry|revision=4.0-5875|OS=Windows 8.1 x64|CPU=Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.4GHz|GPU=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760|result=60FPS all time with some slowdowns to 50FPS|tester=boooi}}
{{testing/entry|revision=4.0-5875|OS=Windows 8.1 x64|CPU=Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.4GHz|GPU=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760|result=60FPS all time with some slowdowns to 50FPS|tester=boooi}}
{{testing/entry|revision=4.0-6953|OS=Windows 10 x64|CPU=Intel Core i5-3570K @4.5Ghz|GPU=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970|result=[http://youtu.be/Ueh_BH2Ubg8 Super Mario Galaxy With texture pack (1080p 60FPS)][https://youtu.be/QpvNliE3zEY Super Mario Galaxy Gameplay]|tester=Vitalicks}}
{{testing/entry|revision=4.0-6953|OS=Windows 10 x64|CPU=Intel Core i5-3570K @4.5Ghz|GPU=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970|result=[http://youtu.be/Ueh_BH2Ubg8 Super Mario Galaxy With texture pack (1080p 60FPS)][https://youtu.be/QpvNliE3zEY Super Mario Galaxy Gameplay]|tester=Vitalicks}}
{{testing/entry|revision=4.0-7506|OS=Windows 7 x64|CPU=Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.2GHz|GPU=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti|result=Played thru the first galaxy. 60FPS with tiny occasional drops (that's just the nature of emulation). Settings that differ from default: Direct3D, 1600x900, 2.5x Native, 4x AA, 16x AF, DSP LLE, No Framelimit. V-Sync + triple-buffering forced in NCP. Tested with OpenGL too, but it was a little worse.|tester=Jodeth}}
{{testing/entry|revision=Ishiiruka 420|OS=Windows 7 x64|CPU=Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.2GHz|GPU=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti|result=Played a few stages in the 2nd galaxy, using an HD texture pack. Excellent performance! 60FPS with rare, small fps drops (that's just the nature of any emulation). Here are my settings and DualShock 4 config: http://i.imgur.com/upIOz11.png|tester=Jodeth}}
{{testing/end}}
{{testing/end}}


Navigation menu