6,576
edits
Template talk:Gecko: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:Gecko template really need a way to display output in pre tags. I can't think of any other use-cases that need this, but preferably not, I can see this becoming rival against Gecko template. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:15, 7 January 2018 (CET) | :Gecko template really need a way to display output in pre tags. I can't think of any other use-cases that need this, but preferably not, I can see this becoming rival against Gecko template. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:15, 7 January 2018 (CET) | ||
::It screws up the documentation on the page though by consuming the includeonly tags, leaving that empty code box at the top of the page. I don't see how a workaround template here would compete with the gecko template, we already have a few smaller templates for stuff like this like [[Template:Hover]], so there's precedent. - [[User:Xerxes|Xerxes]] ([[User talk:Xerxes|talk]]) 09:31, 8 January 2018 (CET) | ::It screws up the documentation on the page though by consuming the includeonly tags, leaving that empty code box at the top of the page. I don't see how a workaround template here would compete with the gecko template, we already have a few smaller templates for stuff like this like [[Template:Hover]], so there's precedent. - [[User:Xerxes|Xerxes]] ([[User talk:Xerxes|talk]]) 09:31, 8 January 2018 (CET) | ||
:::Luckily I don't think the weird bar we see above is distracting. When I said Pre template would compete Gecko template I meant that users might use Pre templates for their Geck codes. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 21:41, 8 January 2018 (CET) | :::Luckily I don't think the weird bar we see above is very distracting. When I said Pre template would compete Gecko template I meant that users might use Pre templates for their Geck codes. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 21:41, 8 January 2018 (CET) | ||
== Widescreen == | == Widescreen == | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
:Which game? It looks like there are variety cheat description for 16:9 code than I though. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 23:40, 7 January 2018 (CET) | :Which game? It looks like there are variety cheat description for 16:9 code than I though. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 23:40, 7 January 2018 (CET) | ||
::[[Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events]] is one game that needs the widescreen hack. I'm sure I've seen it on other more high profile games too, but I can't think of them off the top of my head. Maybe add a <code>|widescreenhack=true</code> or <code>false</code> into the template for 16:9, then have a sentence like "Make sure the widescreen hack is '''disabled''' / '''enabled'''" depending on what it's set to? - [[User:Xerxes|Xerxes]] ([[User talk:Xerxes|talk]]) 09:14, 8 January 2018 (CET) | ::[[Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events]] is one game that needs the widescreen hack. I'm sure I've seen it on other more high profile games too, but I can't think of them off the top of my head. Maybe add a <code>|widescreenhack=true</code> or <code>false</code> into the template for 16:9, then have a sentence like "Make sure the widescreen hack is '''disabled''' / '''enabled'''" depending on what it's set to? - [[User:Xerxes|Xerxes]] ([[User talk:Xerxes|talk]]) 09:14, 8 January 2018 (CET) | ||
:::Thanks, but I'm not comfortable with having another parameter to determine between disabled/enabled requirement for the widescreen code. The sentencing is awkward, I think using a generic cheat description is better suited for the code that requires widescreen hack, it may trigger a "not 16:9" category, but that seems okay to me as it's | :::Thanks, but I'm not comfortable with having another parameter to determine between disabled/enabled requirement for the widescreen code. The sentencing is awkward, I think using a generic cheat description is better suited for the code that requires widescreen hack, it may trigger a "not 16:9" category, but that seems okay to me as it's an incomplete code that doesn't do 16:9 yet. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 21:35, 8 January 2018 (CET) | ||