User talk:Miksel12: Difference between revisions

User talk:Miksel12 (view source)

Revision as of 16:14, 23 June 2019

1 byte removed , 23 June 2019

m

no edit summary

Lucario

6,576

edits

Revision as of 16:11, 23 June 2019 (view source) Lucario (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:14, 23 June 2019 (view source) Lucario (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::: I placed it under enhancements because it is due to an enhancement just like Kolano said. I understand that it is not ideal with the way problems are tracked but I don't think that is a valid reason to put it under problems. [[User:Miksel12\|Miksel12]] ([[User talk:Miksel12\|talk]]) 13:27, 23 June 2019 (CEST)		::: I placed it under enhancements because it is due to an enhancement just like Kolano said. I understand that it is not ideal with the way problems are tracked but I don't think that is a valid reason to put it under problems. [[User:Miksel12\|Miksel12]] ([[User talk:Miksel12\|talk]]) 13:27, 23 June 2019 (CEST)

	:::: "Due to an ~~enhancements~~"? Right, there are lot of ways to name it, "enhancement issue", "issue of an enhancement", etc... even just an "issue" or "problem" can work. I get that going under problems means that'll afflict compatibility rating of a game, so why not let emu info have it? And uh, it's slashed, so it won't affect compatibility rating any more. Does it still has to go under Enhancements? [[User:Lucario\|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario\|talk]]) 16:09, 23 June 2019 (CEST)		:::: "Due to an enhancement"? Right, there are lot of ways to name it, "enhancement issue", "issue of an enhancement", etc... even just an "issue" or "problem" can work. I get that going under problems means that'll afflict compatibility rating of a game, so why not let emu info have it? And uh, it's slashed, so it won't affect compatibility rating any more. Does it still has to go under Enhancements? [[User:Lucario\|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario\|talk]]) 16:09, 23 June 2019 (CEST)