Talk:Bluetooth Passthrough: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
* About table readability: Personally I find the current one good enough. The readability is also OK, but making more clear what the values of exact column means would help | * About table readability: Personally I find the current one good enough. The readability is also OK, but making more clear what the values of exact column means would help | ||
- [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 03:07, 29 October 2016 (CEST) | - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 03:07, 29 October 2016 (CEST) | ||
: The measurement of "Range" + "Audio" + maximum # of Wii Remotes (4 or use "+" sign if owned less than 4) at the same time will give nice, consistent result of each Bluetooth modules from different users. That's why I thought of removing "Range" column and merge them into "Audio" column somehow, hence "Audio" column to receive a revamp. Is it correct that audio data requires good bandwidth than other controller data? I was thinking "Audio" would be good determination on the quality of the Bluetooth modules for Wii Remotes. Can we use relative terms like "exceeded", "good", and "worse" for "Range" column where Wii will be used as reference? They're way better than using some ambiguous length terms. I want the table to basically list which Bluetooth adapters are better or worse than Wii. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 22:45, 29 October 2016 (CEST) | |||
Almost forgot, PLEASE MAINTAIN THE TABLE SORTED ALPHABETICALLY! Thanks, from your wiki neighbor - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 03:09, 29 October 2016 (CEST) | Almost forgot, PLEASE MAINTAIN THE TABLE SORTED ALPHABETICALLY! Thanks, from your wiki neighbor - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 03:09, 29 October 2016 (CEST) | ||